Joe Scarborough Really Stretched the Limits of Sanity With This Take on the...
Fiasco: NYC GOP Councilwoman Just Obliterated Mamdani Over the City's Shambolic Winter Sto...
CBS News Peddled Fake News About Bad Bunny and ICE Post-Super Bowl Performance
Yes, This Was the Best Response to John Kasich's Tweet About the Super...
A Bar Patron Had a Total Meltdown During the Super Bowl. The Reason...
Maybe We Should Be Glad Bad Bunny Performed in Spanish
Notice Where This Ex-ESPN Reporter's Attempt to Mock Conservatives Over Bad Bunny Laughabl...
Why Are Americans Fleeing Blue States for Red States?
A Maryland Squatter Walks Free — and Here's What Her Attorney Had...
AWFUL Who Harassed Yoga Studio Employees Over ICE Earned Herself a Ban
Deadline Tries to Guilt Trip John Lithgow for Starring in HBO's 'Harry Potter'...
Mayor Mamdani Becomes First NYC Leader to Skip Archbishop Installation in Almost a...
When Canadians Were Actually Funny
The Student ICE Walkouts Are a Troubling Reminder of How Revolutionaries Are Made
America’s Security Doesn’t End at the Ice’s Edge
Tipsheet

Upset Alert: Could Republicans Lose a Senate Seat in Mississippi Tonight?

The media's hype of this potential upset has been half-hearted, and for good reason.  Republicans aren't cruising to a blowout in the yet-undecided Mississippi Senate race (the special election, not the regularly-scheduled one, which Roger Wicker won easily) as might typically be expected, but the Alabama comparisons feel strained.  For starters, just a few weeks ago, the two major GOP candidates vying for the seat vacated by Sen. Thad Cochran combined to win 58 percent of the vote, compared to just 40 percent for the leading Democrat.  The leading vote-getter was Cindy Hyde-Smith, the quasi-incumbent, who was appointed in the spring to temporarily serve in Cochran's stead until the next regularly-scheduled election.  Because nobody hit 50 percent of the vote, an automatic runoff was triggered.  That decisive election is being held today.  

Advertisement

Is Hyde-Smith in danger of losing?  She has certainly made some unforced errors -- stepping on rhetorical land mines, and seeming intimidated and ill-prepared for the lone debate of the contest.  Liberal groups launched a pressure campaign against corporations and large organizations who've donated to Hyde-Smith's campaign, notching some high-profile successes.  But even the gloomiest-looking poll, a Republican internal that may have been leaked to make sure GOP voters don't sleepwalk through this one, gave Hyde-Smith a five point lead.  Another more recent poll pegs her advantage at a less-competitive ten points.  

Republicans are painting Hyde-Smith's opponent in the race as a corrupt liberal partisan.  Mike Espy was indicted on 39 public corruption-related counts in the 1990's, leading to his ouster from President Clinton's cabinet, but no criminal convictions.  Espy attacked the prosecutor in the case as a "school yard bully," to which the federal attorney replied by accusing the indicted former cabinet member of betraying the public trust:

Smaltz was offering no apologies, saying his office had won 15 other convictions and generated $11 million in fines. He said Espy's indictment last year on charges that he illegally took $35,000 in gifts sent a strong public message, adding, "The actual indictment of a public official may in fact be as great a deterrent as a conviction of that official." "Public service is a public trust," Smaltz said. "Officials must neither solicit nor accept gifts from any entities that they regulate. The appearance of impropriety can be as damning as bribery is to public confidence."

Advertisement

Among other ethical challenges, Espy has also had multiple tax liens filed against him, and has worked as a high-paid lobbyist on behalf of a repressive African regime.  The Hyde-Smith campaign is nationalizing the election, framing it as a choice between President Trump and the resistance-minded Left.  A look at a few of her recent ads:

Across those three spots, one voice is almost exclusively featured: The president's.  That's not an accident.  Trump spent several hours in the state yesterday, stumping for Hyde-Smith at two separate rallies.  His goals are to rally base conservatives while drawing wider attention to the runoff, and to tie Espy to national Democrats.  If Mississippi stays red, as is anticipated, the GOP will hold a 53-47 Senate majority in the new Congress, giving Mitch McConnell some needed breathing room on key votes -- especially on crucial judicial nominations.  If Hyde-Smith is victorious, Mississippians will also help dim the prospects for a Democratic Senate takeover after 2020, and possibly even shuffle a McCarthyite showboat off of the Senate Judiciary Committee.  I'll leave you with the president's straightforward endorsement in this race:


Parting thought: Comparisons to the Roy Moore debacle in Alabama are lazy and misplaced.  Yes, there's a similarity, in that Democrats are hoping to corral an unlikely Senate pick-up in the deep South.  But Hyde-Smith's flaws as a candidate are not even in the same orbit as Moore's abject unfitness.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos