Democrats Totally Melted Down While Americans Celebrated 250 Years
What Happens Now? Mike Johnson Just Signaled the Next Move on Birthright Citizenship
New York Times Columnist Laments the 'Malaise' of America's 250th by Hoping to...
Mamdani's Post About a 'Gun' at a Mosque Is Missing Some Really Important...
Doug Burgum Embarrasses CNN's Dana Bash Over Reflecting Pool Vandal
Here's Why Abdul El-Sayed Says He Won't Support Chuck Schumer for Senate Majority...
Leftist Trolls Are Trying to Give UK World Cup Fan the Freddy Treatment
Here's How Mamdani's Wife Marked the Fourth of July
The Next Great American Frontier
New York City Has Tried Rent Freezes Before. Here's How They Ended.
Socialists Say Zohran Mamdani Delivered Record-Low Murders in NYC. There's Just One Proble...
Spencer Pratt Has a Message for Zohran Mamdani: 'F**k You Communists'
Tyler Robinson to Face Charlie Kirk’s Widow, Parents in Preliminary Hearing
Team USA Star Player Cleared to Play After FIFA Rejects Belgium’s Appeal
Faith, Opportunity, and the Future of America’s Forgotten Communities
Tipsheet

What's Behind Bowe Bergdahl's Return to Active Duty?

What's Behind Bowe Bergdahl's Return to Active Duty?


I'll admit to being genuinely shocked when I saw tweets along these lines earlier, the contents of which Katie expanded on this afternoon:


Advertisement


My initial reaction: So soon? The deal to secure Bergdahl's release was executed in late May. Six weeks later, he's ready to be re-integrated into an active duty context? The guy was held captive by the Taliban and Haqqanis for five years, and has returned home to a firestorm over compelling allegations of desertion, if not outright collaboration. The public didn't support the Obama administration's 'one-apparent-deserter-for-five-hardened-jihadists' swap, with veterans and military families overwhelmingly opposed to the deal. Current service members have made their views crystal clear, too. So how is this supposed to work, exactly? A distrusted (and no doubt traumatized) accused deserter is back on the job lickity-split despite (a) the military's initial findings that he'd abandoned his post, (b) the fact that a follow-up investigation isn't yet complete, and (c) recent reports of active duty soldiers receiving pink slips while deployed abroad? At first blush, it appeared as though the US Army had internalized Susan Rice's "honor and distinction" idiocy, an indication that the White House's "suck it up and salute" political brigade has won the day. To that end, Katie embeds an angry tweet from one member of Bergdahl's former unit, who evidently perceived the Army's decision to reinstate Bergdahl as a slap in the face. But it seems there's more to the story. Twitter's 'First Team Tommy,' a veteran, admonished outraged conservatives on Twitter, suggesting that this step was necessary for the military justice process to move forward:

Advertisement




Allahpundit summarizes: "I believe that if Bergdahl’s discharged, he can’t be court-martialed. He has to be on active duty for that. (See, e.g., section 802(c)(4) of the UCMJ.) Leaving him in the care of military doctors would also complicate the legal process...Moving him to a desk job at Fort Sam Houston solves those problems." In other words, it's very likely the case that Bergdahl hasn't been re-embraced and set up with a cushy a desk jockey job for kicks; the Army's simply doing what must be done to tee up critical next steps. Critics of the Bergdahl deal and proponents of due process should think twice before venting fury over these developments. Parting thought: Is a court martial conviction, followed by an Obama pardon, in the offing here? Allahpundit thinks it's inevitable, while Tommy adamantly disagrees. I tend to lean in the latter direction, but the White House's acute tone-deafness on this entire matter has been mystifying, so you never know.

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement