We Need Democrats Like John Fetterman
The USCCB Issues New Directive Banning 'Gender-Affirming Care' at Catholic Healthcare Faci...
Not Ready? Please.
What New York City Has to Look Forward To
Russian Military Intelligence Ship Detected Off the Coast of Hawaii
The Candy Man
A Quick Bible Study Vol. 294: Trusting God Is a Challenge – Old...
Bosnian-Born U.S. Citizen Pleads Guilty to Lying About Wartime Crimes to Obtain Citizenshi...
Hong Kong Man Indicted in Alleged SEC Filing Fraud Linked to $211 Million...
Trump Threatens To Replace RINO Indiana Republicans Who Won't Redistrict
John Fetterman Recovering From Fall After 20 Stitches
Federal Firearm Indictments Up 292 Percent Under Expanded Project Safe Neighborhoods in No...
If There’s No God, There’s No Thought
Trump's 'Save the Christians' Battle Cry: It Is Heroic, but Dodges Nigeria's Deeper...
A Jarring Reminder of Our Nation’s Cultural Demise
Tipsheet

Ramesh Ponnuru: Pawlenty Can Win

The conventional wisdom on Tim Pawlenty's presumptive presidential bid is that he's too bland, lacks charisma, and is a relative unknown -- all of which diminish his prospects. 
Advertisement
National Review's Ramesh Ponnuru profiles Pawlenty and envisions a number of paths to victory for the former Minnesota Governor:

Pawlenty is more electable than Palin, who is on the wrong end of a two-to-one split in public opinion; or Huckabee, who has never demonstrated any ability to win votes from non-evangelical voters; or Gingrich, who has enough baggage to open a Louis Vuitton store; or Haley Barbour, who, as a former lobbyist for tobacco companies and the governor of Mississippi, combines several Republican stereotypes to damaging effect. Electability would probably hand Pawlenty the nomination in a one-on-one race against any of these contenders.

He would probably beat Romney in a head-to-head race, too. Like Romney, Pawlenty was elected governor of a blue state in 2002. But there are at least five big differences between them that primary voters may find tell in the Minnesotan’s favor. First, Pawlenty was elected as a conservative whereas Romney ran as a moderate. Second, Pawlenty pursued a more confrontational strategy: He didn’t cut any grand bipartisan deal, as Romney did with Ted Kennedy on health care. Third, and as a result, Pawlenty’s record does not include anything as likely to offend conservative voters as Romney’s Massachusetts health-care law, which made the purchase of health insurance compulsory.

Fourth, Pawlenty won reelection in his blue state, even in 2006, which was a slaughterhouse of a year for Republicans. Romney, by contrast, left the governorship after one term: He was unable to position himself as a conservative for a presidential run while staying popular in his home state. Fifth, Pawlenty has an ability to connect to blue-collar voters that Romney has never demonstrated.
Advertisement

Team Pawlenty is hoping their guy turns into to be a consensus conservative pick -- perhaps not immediately, but equally inoffensive, to the majority of the base.  Ponnuru suggests that if TPaw can force any of his rivals into a two-man race, he'll prevail. 


UPDATE -  Mitt Romney is beginning to unveil his Romneycare vs. Obamacare talking points, arguing that he was right to pursue his Massachusetts policy, whereas Obamacare should be repealed.  Hello, federalism:


Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement