The Worst Day of the Year Has Arrived. How Trump and the Republicans...
What Nancy Pelosi Said About Eric Swalwell Is Flat-Out Unbelievable
Here's When Ruben Gallego Froze When Asked About the Rumors Surrounding Pal, Eric...
Here's Joe Biden Awkward Moment With a Black Man at Syracuse University
Speaker Johnson Says This Dem Rep Has to Go
Well, That's Bound to Be an Awkward Moment Between Trump and This Paper...
Why Is the Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction Hiding Public School Spending Data?
A 'British National' Murdered Two Women, Including a DHS Employee, in Georgia
Tom Homan Has the Perfect Response for Catholic Leaders Complaining About Immigration Enfo...
A U.K. Headteacher Warned People About the Southport Terrorist, Guess Why She Was...
Mamdani's Government-Run Grocery Store Plan Gets Even Worse
Trump’s Not Wrong on the Euros
Hasan Piker: 'The Fall of the USSR Was One of the Greatest Catastrophes...
A Top Democrat in California's Governor Race Just Vowed to Take the Most...
Tim Tebow Is Doing the Government's Job
Tipsheet

Gawker Goes After Meg Whitman's Children

Gawker Goes After Meg Whitman's Children
Over the weekend, a Left-leaning gossip blog unleashed a series of hit pieces on the sons of California Republican Gubernatorial candidate Meg Whitman.

A Gawker blog post
Advertisement
, authored by someone named Maureen O'Connell, peddles an allegation that one of Whitman's sons raped a Princeton classmate in 2006.  The "report" quotes unnamed third parties as its primary source of evidence.  Implicit throughout the piece is a vague suggestion that Meg Whitman, a major Princeton donor, paid big hush money to make the issue go away.  The problem: There's absolutely no evidence substantiating the innuendo.  There was also never a criminal complaint filed in connection with the supposed assault -- perhaps because there's cause to reasonably believe the encounter was consensual.  The post also details other boorish behavior by the young man in question, who, in truth, doesn't appear to be a saint. 

A second post, also by O'Connell, asks "What is Wrong with Meg Whitman's Kids?"  This time, she drops major bombshells: Whitman's younger son was recently cited for careless driving.  Even more shocking, this same young man pleaded guilty to a 2007 noise violation, when he was an undergraduate in college.  The horror!

O'Connell proceeds to suggest Whitman is a bad mother:

A political newcomer, Meg Whitman credits her late political awakening (she didn't register to vote until seven years ago) to her busy schedule: She was "focused on raising a family." And yet her two adult sons have been absent from her campaign, perhaps because both boys have faced their share of scandals.
Advertisement

Let's review Liberalism's Official Rules of Political Etiquette.  Under the formula,  speaking ill of a political candidate's family -- especially his or her children -- is strictly forbidden.  In 2008, Barack Obama lashed out at critics of his wife, Michelle, calling the attacks "low class."  Ignoring the fact that Michelle was one of the Obama campaign's top political surrogates, the mainstream media immediately entered outrage mode, amplifying Obama's meme by tut-tutting that Republicans had crossed a line.

Whitman is discovering a major loophole in the rule:  The regulations only apply to Democratic candidates. Just ask Sarah Palin.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement