That Response From a Swing State Focus Group Member Definitely Annoyed This CNN...
The Regime Media Is Against Free Speech
BREAKING: Multiple People Injured in Delta Airlines Plane Crash at Toronto Airport
NAACP Wants to Punish Companies for Abandoning DEI Instead of Seeking Real Solution...
Democrats Are Big Mad That DOGE Is Targeting Their Favorite Federal Agency
CBS News Has Lost Its Way, Blaming Free Speech for Nazis and Promoting...
Arkansas Bill Would Cripple ATF Efforts in State
Trump ‘Deadly Serious’ About Stopping Iran From Getting Nukes, Waltz Says
Pardoned Pro-Lifers: 'Trump Saved My Life'
Elon Musk Exposes Shocking Discovery: Millions in Social Security Database Listed as 100-1...
Here's Why AP's Stubbornness on Gulf of America Is Even More Ridiculous
A Republican State Lawmaker Wants to Create a DOGE for His State
Louisiana-New York Governors Get Into It Over Indictment of Provider in Abortion-Pill Case
Hakeem Jeffries Confronted With a Painful Reality
Jack Smith Discloses Eyebrow-Raising Gift
Tipsheet

Murkowski Update: There Was A Vote

A short while ago, I spoke with a senior GOP aide who helped shed some light on what happened behind closed doors this afternoon:

(1) Sen. Barrasso's elevation to conference leadership was unanimous and did not require a vote.
Advertisement


(2) There *was* a vote on Murkowski's Energy Committee status, although her name didn't appear on the ballot, and the question was couched in procedural language.  The issue her colleagues were asked to consider was phrased as a referendum on whether or not Sen. Richard Burr of North Carolina should assume the role of ranking member on the committee.  If the motion had carried, it would have served as the de facto demotion of Murkowski that many Republicans were expecting prior to the meeting.

(3) The vote did not pass, and the final tally was not announced.  Leadership reportedly did not argue in favor of Murkowski retaining her seniority, and left the question entirely up to the conference at large.

The source tells me that the prevailing--but not entirely unified--sense in the room was that: (a) Murkowski is widely expected to lose in November, (b) someone else (likely Burr) will fill this position when the new Congress convenes in January, and (c) it wasn't worth replacing Murkowski (and in the process both bucking tradition and unnecessarily antagonizing her) for what amounts to a little more than a week of Energy Committee business.
Advertisement


The aide said that the conference's ultimate and more meaningful disavowal of Murkowski is evidenced by its lock-step support for Joe Miller--both rhetorically and financially.  He said there was absolutely no indication whatsoever that the conference reached its decision based on any implicit or explicit threat that Murkowski could wreak havoc in a lame-duck Congressional session by siding with Democrats on key votes.  He said it was doubtful any members had even heard from Murkowski since the official announcement of her write-in candidacy.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement