New Biden Emails Reveal Details About the Ukraine Whistleblower That Got Trump Impeached
Biden Can't Capitalize on His Supposed 'Superpower' for 2024
Yale Student Stabbed at Pro-Hamas Demonstration Describes How the Campus Is a Terror...
Is Hollywood Unwokening?
Capitalism Versus Racism
Current Thoughts on the Campaign
Barnard Caves, Offers to Lift Most Student Suspensions Over Protests at Columbia
'Pathetic': DeSantis Blasts House Republicans for Giving Up Their Leverage on Top Voter...
Is the FBI Monitoring These Pro-Terrorist Student Demonstrations?
City Where Emergency Response Time Is 36 Minutes Wants to Ban Civilians Carrying...
A Swiss Air Jet Nearly Collided With Four Planes at JFK Airport
This Post on the 'Progressive' Pro-Hamas Mob Absolutely Nails It
'Disturbing' Is an Understatement When Describing Would-Be Trans Shooter's Manifesto
In Every Generation They Try to Destroy Us
Love to See It: Cathy McMorris Rodgers, Ted Cruz Fight to Protect Public...
Tipsheet

CNN Shaping The Election: What About Abortion On The Ballot?

In 1984 President Reagan said: "When the lives of the unborn are snuffed out, they often feel pain, pain that is long and agonizing."

You may often hear the liberal argument against professing Christians: We believe in science and you do not. The darkness in this statement can be easily brought to light. First, science tells us NOTHING about morality: whether something is right or wrong, good or evil, ugly or beautiful, loving or unkind, etc. Science provides us with results. After much scrutiny, experimentation, and testing, these results become facts. Now what? Based on liberal argumentation, these facts or results are enough, but they are not.
Advertisement


For example, let's say science could prove--without a doubt--that the Earth was cooling or heating. Now what? Is this good or is it bad? Will life expectancy increase or decrease? Will quality of life improve or diminish. In other words, science is never the proverbial nail in the coffin. But, as we all know, our personal morality determines whether scientific results amount to good or bad moral consequences.

BTW: The most precious things in life can't be scientifically proven. For example, a hug or a kiss can indicate the feeling we call love, but love itself is--in my opinion--God's funny way of showing us that we all believe things that can't be seen or proven to exist. But I digress--kinda.

Unfortunately for pro-abortionists, progress in the scientific world is not producing results that support their morality and values. This is one of the reasons why America has become more pro-life than pro-abortion.

As science proves that the baby feels pain at a younger and younger stage of gestation (which is the course it continues on), the more we see that the pro-choice/pro-abortion supporters do not believe science to be the final arbiter of their decision making--they believe in their own personal, twisted morality. That is why, at the 4:04 mark, we see Terry O'Neill (NOW's--National Org. for Women--pro-abortion advocate) uncomfortably smile when Marjorie Dannenfelser says that the
Advertisement
baby in the womb, like the mother, is a patient too. What else could she do but smile?

As human beings--and especially us political animals--we argue and fight for all kinds of policies, candidates, and obscure issues, but all this would mean nothing if our mothers had decided to abort us. Life is foundational to everything we believe.

HT: VHABEEB.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement