Here's the Question Scott Bessent Pitched to a Dem Senator...and It Really Set...
Report Exposes This Democrat's Ties to Terrorism
Midterm Palpitations
California Lawmakers Pushing Another Stupid Gun Control Bill
More Emotional Fervor Over the Washington Post Layoffs, As the Paper Proves Why...
Dear WaPo Journalists: How'd That Kamala Endorsement Boycott Work Out for You?
Maine Senate Poll Is Good News for Susan Collins
A Pro-Gun Bill Out of Illinois? Yeah, but Don't Get Your Hopes Up
Tucker Carlson Implies Muslims and Christians Get Along, It’s the Jews Who Oppress...
Harry Enten: 'Donald Trump, MAGA, JD Vance, They Ain't Going Nowhere'
The Washington Post’s Meltdown Is What Entitlement Looks Like
Florida Biofuel Company Owner Pleads Guilty in $7 Million EPA Biodiesel Scheme
Antifa Member Arrested After Urging Others To 'Hunt' ICE Agents
Authorities Arrest Maryland Man Accused of Stalking and Trying To Kill OMB Director...
Ex-Director of NY Legal Aid Group Blew Its Money on Bali Trip, Louis...
Tipsheet

The Supreme Court Takes Up Major Case on Asylum at the Southern Border

AP Photo/John McDonnell

The Supreme Court has agreed to review a rule established by the Trump administration that sought to limit asylum seekers at the U.S.-Mexico border, in an order issued Thursday. 

Advertisement

The case, Noem v. Al Otro Lado, will determine what constitutes "arriving" in the United States, a question the Trump administration argues must be decided on the U.S. side of the southern border. When an asylum seeker "arrives" in the U.S., they must be inspected by an immigration officer and may begin the asylum process. 

The Trump administration's rule, called "metering," is when Border Patrol turns away or delays asylum-seekers at official border crossings, claiming the port is full, and restricts entry to a limited daily number. This typically occurs on the Mexico side of the border. 

An appeals court ruled that "metering" is an unlawful practice and that the asylum seeker "arrives" when they meet a U.S. immigration officer, regardless of which side of the border that happens. 

Advertisement

In 2023, the United States protected 54,350 asylum seekers, including 22,300 individuals granted asylum by U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services within DHS and 32,050 individuals defensively granted asylum by the Department of Justice’s Executive Office for Immigration Review, according to data from the Office of Homeland Security Statistics. 

A defensive grant of asylum means the individual was granted protection from deportation while already in removal proceedings.

The Supreme Court is expected to hear arguments next year and come to a decision at the beginning of summer. 

Editor’s Note: Thanks to President Trump, illegal immigration into our great country has virtually stopped. Despite the radical left's lies, new legislation wasn't needed to secure our border, just a new president.

Help us continue to report the truth about the president's border policies and mass deportations. Join Townhall VIP and use promo code FIGHT to get 60% off your membership.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement