Marjorie Taylor Greene Says She 'Feels Sorry' for President Trump After He Calls...
Appeals Court Issues Major Ruling on Ban Against Transgenders in the Military
Apple Blocked This Anti-ICE App – Now the Creators Are Suing Trump Administration...
The Chaos of Biden's Immigration Policies Was the Point
Bruen Decision Made NYC So Unsafe, It's Having Record-Setting Lack of Murders
Trump's Job Is To Stay Focused On The Economy
Girls' Wrestling Now the Fastest-Growing Sport in the Country, and It Starts Young
CAIR Director Says Somali's Are the Real Victim's in $1 Billion Fraud Scandal
MS-13 Assassin Who Killed Ex-President’s Son Captured by Federal Agents in Nebraska Suburb
Trump Admin Says Biden’s Migrant Surge is to Blame for Sky-High Housing Prices
As Ties to Billion-Dollar Fraud Scandal Surfaces, Ilhan Omar Turns to Her Favorite...
Trump Dismisses Calls For Conservative Justices to Retire as GOP Pushes Pre-Midterms Court...
Stephen Miller Argues Somali Migration Is 'Exactly What Our Founding Fathers Feared the...
NJ Twins Arrested After Threatening to Hang and Torture DHS Assistant Secretary
Surviving Cold and Conflict in Ukraine
Tipsheet

The Supreme Court Takes Up Major Case on Asylum at the Southern Border

AP Photo/John McDonnell

The Supreme Court has agreed to review a rule established by the Trump administration that sought to limit asylum seekers at the U.S.-Mexico border, in an order issued Thursday. 

Advertisement

The case, Noem v. Al Otro Lado, will determine what constitutes "arriving" in the United States, a question the Trump administration argues must be decided on the U.S. side of the southern border. When an asylum seeker "arrives" in the U.S., they must be inspected by an immigration officer and may begin the asylum process. 

The Trump administration's rule, called "metering," is when Border Patrol turns away or delays asylum-seekers at official border crossings, claiming the port is full, and restricts entry to a limited daily number. This typically occurs on the Mexico side of the border. 

An appeals court ruled that "metering" is an unlawful practice and that the asylum seeker "arrives" when they meet a U.S. immigration officer, regardless of which side of the border that happens. 

Advertisement

In 2023, the United States protected 54,350 asylum seekers, including 22,300 individuals granted asylum by U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services within DHS and 32,050 individuals defensively granted asylum by the Department of Justice’s Executive Office for Immigration Review, according to data from the Office of Homeland Security Statistics. 

A defensive grant of asylum means the individual was granted protection from deportation while already in removal proceedings.

The Supreme Court is expected to hear arguments next year and come to a decision at the beginning of summer. 

Editor’s Note: Thanks to President Trump, illegal immigration into our great country has virtually stopped. Despite the radical left's lies, new legislation wasn't needed to secure our border, just a new president.

Help us continue to report the truth about the president's border policies and mass deportations. Join Townhall VIP and use promo code FIGHT to get 60% off your membership.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos