We Have the Results of Trump's Cognitive Score
Why the Washington Nationals Just Fired One of Their Executives. Hint: It's Woke...
Japan Overhauled Its Entire Intelligence Community...and One Nation Is Not Happy About It
NY Gov Tried to Dunk on Trump About the Knicks, and Failed Miserably
Why This Milwaukee Brewers Pitcher Got a One-Game Suspension. It Was Pretty Damn...
Jefferson on How to Restore the Republic
Pollsters Are Underestimating Trump 10 Years Later. What Might It Mean for the...
The Push by Democrats to Ban One of the Commonly Owned Handguns in...
How AI Threatens to Destroy the Core Self and How to Fight Back
Mission Laundering: What the OpenAI Verdict Didn't Resolve
Germany's Bureaucracy Crisis: How Red Tape Is Costing the Economy €146 Billion a...
The Real AI Risk Isn’t Regulation. It’s Strategic Blindness.
America Is Sleepwalking Toward Q-Day While Cybercriminals Prepare for the Future
Putin’s Efforts to Subvert Armenia’s Elections Can Harm US Interests
The Deal to Keep the Islamic Republic Alive
Tipsheet

Inside the Beautifully Bloated Bureaucracy at the State Department

Inside the Beautifully Bloated Bureaucracy at the State Department
AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana

In late June, the Supreme Court gave the green light for the federal government to proceed with broad workforce reductions, overturning a block imposed by lower courts. Senator Marco Rubio, working with senior officials at the State Department, began the process of downsizing and quickly ran into some of the most absurd inefficiencies the agency had to offer.

Advertisement

During a briefing on Monday, officials told reporters that they couldn't even get a total headcount of State Department employees. "They couldn't tell you how many people worked here. It’s sort of scary as a taxpayer and as a public servant to think that we don't even know how many employees we have. This is a national security agency, you know. Who are these people?" an official said (via Fox News).

The ongoing reorganization of the department will result in a reduction of about 3,000 employees. Around half of them took a voluntary buyout, the other half received reduction-in-force notices. Former employees were seen this week leaving the State Department with boxes of their belongings, many of whom were in tears.

Secretary Rubio's advisors analyzed over 700 domestic offices, finding that many positions were duplicative and many others were inefficient. There were dozens of offices handling tasks for human resources, three different offices dealing with sanctions, and two handling arms control issues. They shut down a "diplomats in residence" program, which, according to an official, is simply a program where "State Department employees are getting paid to go hang out at Georgetown, and sort of recruit for the Foreign Service without any sort of metrics or accountability." 

Advertisement

They even found that some documents were going through 40-50 different layers of approval processes. The fix, just to streamline the process, was to cap it at 12 layers of approval.

An official told reporters:

Some of these regional offices within this sort of functional civil liberties, civil society, bureaus of democracy, human rights and labor, population, refugees and migration each had their own regional offices in addition to the country desk, regional bureau, construct. Every independent bureau and office had its own executive director, its own HR department, its own payments.We were making payments out of like 60 plus different offices.

The same official noted that "It’s crazy that a department that's tasked with so many critical diplomatic, national security functions, with a $50 billion-plus budget, is running its affairs that way." 

Critics of the layoff have suggested that the State Department will lose its ability to maintain U.S. diplomacy abroad and counter soft flexing of Chinese power.

"A climate change office is not countering China," an official quipped. 

Advertisement

A group of more than 130 former senior officials signed an open letter expressing concerns about the endangerment of U.S. foreign policy effectiveness. How useless positions and programs will endanger America's policy abroad is still an unanswered question.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos