UNL Student Government Passes SJP-Backed Israel Divestment Resolution
How Long Can America Go on Like This?
Intrusive Bankers and Government Overreach
Trump’s America First Dealmaking on AI Export Controls
Washington Post Layoffs Mark Long-Awaited Decline of Regime Media
Biology and Common Sense Triumph Over Radical Transgender Ideology
Respect the Badge. Enforce the Law but Fix the System.
In the Super Bowl of Drug Ads, Trump’s FDA Plays the Long Game...
From Open Borders to Ruinous Powderkegs
New Musical Remakes Anne Frank As a Genderqueer Hip-Hop Star
Toledo Man Indicted for Threatening to Kill Vice President JD Vance During Ohio...
Fort Lauderdale Financial Advisor Sentenced to 20 Years for $94M International Ponzi Schem...
FCC Is Reportedly Investigating The View
Illegal Immigrant Allegedly Used Stolen Identity to Vote and Collect $400K in Federal...
$26 Billion Gone: Stellantis Joins Automakers Retreating From EVs
Tipsheet

Dem Rep: "We Aren't Being Paid Properly"

Is this becoming a trend? Instead of using his time in front of the cameras to champion the rights of working and middle class Americans, Rep. Alcee Hastings (D-FL) showed his true colors yesterday by arguing that members of Congress deserve a raise.

Advertisement

Huh? Evidently, his six-figure salary isn’t enough:

Rep. Alcee L. Hastings made the politically tone-deaf case for raising salaries for members of Congress Monday, pointing to the high cost of living in the District of Columbia.

“Members deserve to be paid, staff deserves to be paid and the cost of living here is causing serious problems for people who are not wealthy to serve in this institution,” the Florida Democrat said at a Rules Committee meeting, referring to the average member’s $174,000 annual salary. “We aren’t being paid properly,” he later added.

In fairness, as the article points out, Rep. Hastings is one of the ‘poorest’ members of Congress. But having no wealth as a federal lawmaker is like being the lowliest member of the country club. Remember, the guy makes $174,000 annually, as do all his colleagues. Is that not generous enough? And while that does not necessarily put him in the vaunted one percent, he’s doing pretty damn well all things considered. So if he were serious about the financial cares and concerns of ordinary people—like, say, his constituents—wouldn't he put their interests first?

Apparently, however, the cost of living in DC is just too expensive for him to devote himself to such trivial matters. Well done, sir.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement