If That Figure Is Correct, That Is a Massive Infiltration of Hezbollah by...
Australian Federal Police Commissioner Did Not Just Say That About the Bondi Terror...
Hamas Operatives Funneled Over $8 Million to Military Wing in Italian Fundraising Scheme
White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt Is Pregnant
Louisiana Conspiracy Used Chop Shop and Fake Company to Sell Stolen Tractors, Excavators,...
Over $200,000 in Cryptocurrency Forfeited in Multi-State Elder Fraud Case
Tweaking the Naughty List: Cops Seize 55 Pounds of Drugs Disguised as Christmas...
Jamaican National Sentenced to More Than 24 Years in Federal Meth Trafficking Case
Why is Ilhan Omar's Husband's Investment Firm Removing Names From Their Website?
Tennessee Bookkeeper Who Stole $4.6 Million From Clients Sentenced to Prison
Make Vehicles Affordable Again
FBI Saves Taxpayers Billions in HQ Relocation
Gunman Dead, 3 Injured After Opening Fire on Idaho Sheriff's Office
Indicted Democrat Gets Dragged For Post Hiding $100k Ring Bought With Dirty Money
340B Program is Hidden Tax on Patients, Employers and Taxpayers
Tipsheet
Premium

Why Disability Applicants Are Suing the Social Security Administration

AP Photo/Patrick Semansky

Per its policy, the Social Security Administration is refusing to accept electronic signatures for disability claims. With the coronavirus pandemic making that mandate ever more dangerous, a handful of plaintiffs are now suing the agency to change its policy.

Timothy Cole, who has non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, argues that the safest way for him to file his claim is from his home. He is joining three other plaintiffs, along with the National Federation of the Blind, in suing the Social Security Administration in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.

Mr. Cole and three other plaintiffs, along with the National Federation of the Blind, are suing the Social Security Administration in federal court. They seek a court order requiring SSA to allow e-signatures on applications rather than requiring a "wet-ink" signature when the applicant is using an attorney or other authorized representative. SSA does not require wet-ink signatures for applications for some benefits when an authorized representative is not being used by the applicant. The suit contends that the requirement has always been discriminatory, but during the COVID-19 pandemic it also endangers the health and even the lives of applicants, as even SSA has recognized in quarantining its own mail for two days and shutting down its field offices.

William Ashlock, 60, Cole's fellow plaintiff, has a similar predicament. Plagued by pain and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, he is concerned by the SSA's demands.

"When I was released from the hospital, the doctors said it might not be a good idea to go to a shelter at the moment because of the pandemic," Ashlock said in a statement for the court. "I am trying to stay on my own as much as possible to avoid COVID-19."

The lawsuit also asks the court to order the SSA to allow blind people to fill out the application for Supplemental Security Income online.

"The Social Security Administration regularly interacts with hundreds of thousands of blind people and other consumers with disabilities," said Mark Riccobono, President of the National Federation of the Blind. "Yet policies like this one persist, despite the fact that the SSA has both the authority and the capability to accept electronic signatures. It is both unlawful and unconscionable that this agency continues to place blind and disabled consumers at a severe disadvantage, especially during a life-threatening global pandemic. Government should innovate, not discriminate."

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement