Iran Is Merely a Chess Piece in a Much Bigger Game
Watch Jasmine Crockett's Absurd Speech to Her Supporters After Losing the Texas Senate...
That Oyster Farmer With the Nazi Tattoos Who's Trying to Unseat Susan Collins...
Wait, the Austin Police Officers Who Stopped a Terrorist Are Going Before a...
GOP Senators Detail the Consequences of This Dem-Led DHS Shutdown
Secretary Hegseth Held Another Press Conference on Operation Epic Fury. Here's What He...
U.S. and Ecuador Launch Joint Strikes on Narco-Terrorists in Ecuador
Just Days After Condemning Operation Epic Fury, Zohran Mamdani's Flip-Flopped on Iran
I Hate You More Than I Love Them
Under Trump's Great Leadership, America Is Doing What Must Be Done in Iran
Competition, Not Consolidation, Is the Cure for Rising Healthcare Costs
Ultimate Success in Iran Is Not As Elusive As Critics Charge
Fourth-Wave Feminism: Reform or Tsunami?
Medical Devices Shouldn’t Become National Security Risks
Let the Senate Debate the SAVE America Act for As Long As Democrats...
Tipsheet

Nadler Reacts to White House Refusing Counsel for Impeachment Hearings

Nadler Reacts to White House Refusing Counsel for Impeachment Hearings
AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite

The Trump administration will not be sending counsel to this week's impeachment inquiry hearings as the House Judiciary Committee takes the baton from the Intelligence Committee, White House counsel Pat Cipollone informed the panel this weekend. Judiciary Chairman Jerry Nadler shared his disappointment.

Advertisement

"His response is unfortunate because allowing the president to participate has been a priority for the House from the outset," Nadler added.

If Trump truly believed his phone call with the Ukrainian president was "perfect," then he'd have no problem being more cooperative with their inquiry, the chairman argued. 

As Cipollone explained, there are a few problems. In his letter to Nadler, the White House counsel rejected the Democrats’ argument that their impeachment inquiry is affording President Trump the same due process that President Clinton got during his impeachment proceedings. For instance, during that 1990s scandal, the Judiciary Committee allowed committee members two and a half weeks to prepare their questions. As Cipollone points out, the hearing was scheduled for only five days out from the day they received Nadler’s latest invitation.

Advertisement

“Today, by contrast, you have afforded the president no scheduling input, no meaningful information, and so little time to prepare that you have effectively denied the Administration a fair opportunity to participate,” Cipollone notes.

Clinton was also allowed to call over a dozen witnesses. The same doesn't appear to be true for Trump. This time around, it's all secrecy and closed-door depositions, and the administration sees no way that the president would be compelled to participate in such an environment.

"Despite the fundamental unfairness of those hearings, the facts that emerged even from Chairman Schiff’s carefully controlled and blatantly unfair process served only to further confirm that the President has done nothing wrong and that there is no basis for continuing your inquiry," Cipollone writes. "Inviting the Administration now to participate in an after-the-fact constitutional law seminar-with yet-to-be-named witnesses-only demonstrates further the countless procedural deficiencies that have infected this inquiry from its inception and shows the lack of seriousness with which you are undertaking these proceedings. An academic discussion cannot retroactively fix an irretrievably broken process."

Advertisement

The timing of the Wednesday hearing is another red flag. Before he left for London on Monday to attend this week's NATO summit, President Trump told the press that Democrats should be ashamed of themselves.

"It's a disgrace what they're doing to our country," he said.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos