Too Many Democrats Are a Special Kind of Stupid
A Quick Bible Study Vol. 319: What the Bible Says About Holding Grudges
'We Are Socialists'
Donald Trump's Razzle-Dazzle
All That I Am, I Owe to My Angel Mother
The Paper Tiger of the 14th Amendment: Reclaiming the American Birthright
Alien Life Would Not Refute Religion—but It Would Challenge Materialistic Evolution
Silence in the Face of Slaughter: The Crisis in Northern Nigeria
If Abortion Is 'Healthcare,' Why Are They Removing Healthcare From It?
The Myth of Science
Five-Time Felon Allegedly Ran COVID-19 Unemployment Scam Using Inmates' Identities
Russian President Putin Says Russia-Ukraine War Is 'Coming to an End'
DOJ Seeks to Denaturalize 12 Accused of Serious Crimes
North Carolina's Autism Billing Jumped 47,000 Percent in Five Years. Someone Should Explai...
Two Syracuse Cops Shot, Suspect Barricaded After Reportedly Slicing Dog With Machete
Tipsheet

Gillibrand: Yeah I Could Support Tearing Down Existing Walls Too

Gillibrand: Yeah I Could Support Tearing Down Existing Walls Too
AP Photo/Jacquelyn Martin

It seems we have yet another 2020 Democratic presidential candidate who not only wants to prevent the construction of a longer wall along the southern border, but would be fine with tearing down existing ones. 

Advertisement

When asked by MSNBC anchor Chris Hayes on Thursday, Beto O'Rourke said he'd "absolutely" tear down the current border wall in El Paso. He was also confident that he'd get support from the community. It's an unnecessary and expensive burden, according to the Texas lawmaker, also referring to it as a “perverse” overreaction to the September 11 terror attacks. Terrorism, he explained, is a legitimate concern, but instead of focusing on real solutions the U.S. has decided to "punish people from Mexico at the U.S.-Mexico border."

We were just taking a few moments to let that sink in, until another Democrat came on board the "tear down the border wall" platform. Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY) suggested that she could support O'Rourke's idea if it made sense.

“I’d have to ask folks in that part of the country to see whether the fencing that exists today is helpful or unhelpful,” she began.

She refuses to consider Trump's "medieval style wall" that will "destroy the community and the environment." But, she will at least "look" at O'Rourke's idea. 

"If it makes sense I could support it," she said.

KUSI News in San Diego has evidence to contradict O'Rourke's assessment about border fencing. Local reporter Dan Plante told viewers that after speaking with border agents and other members in the community, he found that the wall was "effective." Unsurprisingly, the anchors noted that CNN was not interested in their report.

Advertisement

Then we have New York Post writer Paul Sperry, who penned an op-ed about how the wall works in El Paso. He provided statistics to show that the barrier had resulted in a "remarkable" turnaround on crime.

Rep. Dan Crenshaw (R-TX) also noted that, in his discussions with El Paso residents, he's heard much different sentiments than those shared by O'Rourke.

It's all coming into focus.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement