Don't Miss Our MASSIVE State of the Union VIP Sale
Trump Won’t Say It Out Loud but His Team Thinks They Know Who...
You'll Never Guess How the Authorities Found and Killed Cartel Leader El Mencho
OpenAI Flagged Canada Mass Shooter for Violent Content, but Didn't Contact the Authorities
Tony Evers Just Sold Wisconsin Out to the World Health Organization
A Tempest in a Locker Room: Taking a Sober Look at Kash Patel’s...
The Press Ignores an Assassination Attempt As the Huffington Post Takes the Gold...
The Atlantic Thinks Republicans Have a 'Nazi Problem'
Proof that Anti-Gun Group Cares About Control, Not Safety
Social Media Erupts After HuffPost Questions National Pride at the Winter Olympics
Here's How the Supreme Court's Tariff Ruling Exposes Liberal Justices Desire to Expand...
The Violence in Mexico Vindicates Trump’s Push to Treat Drug Cartels As Terrorists...
Gavin Newsom Doubles Down on His Racist Comments: It's 'Fake F**king Outrage'
The Women's Hockey Team Snubbed Trump's SOTU Invite
Limited Government, Lasting Opportunity
Tipsheet

Washington State Employees Sue to Leave Union After Being Told They Missed the 'Escape Period'

Washington State Employees Sue to Leave Union After Being Told They Missed the 'Escape Period'

The Supreme Court's recent ruling in Janus v. AFSCME is already having an impact on workers' unions across the country. In June, the high court said state government workers could not be forced to pay “fair share” fees to support collective bargaining and other union activities. It was a huge defeat for Big Labor.

Advertisement

Employees in Washington state are pouncing on the Supreme Court case as a way to leave the Washington Federation of State Employees. The six plaintiffs on the suit were told they have to wait until next year's “escape period” because their membership agreements only allowed a window of 10 and 20 days for them to resign from the union once a year. They sued, demanding their restitution of dues.

“I just want what’s right and fair, and the way the union has treated me since the Janus decision is not right, nor fair,” said Department of Social and Health Services employee Mike Stone, one of the plaintiffs. “WFSE doesn’t share my views or my values. I don’t want my money being used to support an organization I disagree with.”

Another plaintiff, Ms. Torres, said it was unclear what she was even signing when she first joined the union. Like the other employees on the suit, she reportedly was under the impression that membership was required, as opposed to just paying the reduced fee as a nonmember.

"It’s totally unethical for the union to trick state workers to sign away their constitutional rights and then turn around and tell you that you cannot opt out because you signed a contract,” she said in a statement provided to Fox News. “I had no knowledge that the form they provided was a contract. This is an outrage and disrespectful. I want my right to opt out.”

Advertisement

The Freedom Foundation filed the suit on behalf of the plaintiffs.

Mark Mix, president of the National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation, cheered the June Janus decision, but noted that there was still a lot of work to do to beat coercive unionism.

"Millions of private sector workers in states without Right to Work protections are still forced to pay union fees or else be fired," he noted in a statement. "Further, workers of all stripes continue to have their freedoms of association violated by being forced under union monopoly ‘representation’ against their will."

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement