Joe Biden’s Final Humiliation And The Fight Ahead
Wait, It Was the WH Chief of Staff Who Informed the Cabinet of...
Biden Becomes A Non-Entity
The Abbott and Costello Democrat Party Skit
Joe Biden’s Real Problem
Election 2024: Living in Interesting Times
Hey, Lefties, You Abandoned Joe Biden for the Wrong Reasons
Desperate Democrats Ditch Democracy
Mr. President, Nobody Believes You
A Prayer for President Biden
When Fringe Becomes Mainstream
'Our Democracy' and the Sandbagging of Joe Biden
The Sopranos Take Over the Bill of Rights
'Heated Rhetoric' and Moral Responsibility
Donald Trump, George Washington, Character, and Providence

Hillary Says She Hasn't 'Studied' Schumer's 9/11 Bill, But Supports it Anyway

Hillary Clinton’s interview with ABC’s George Stephanopoulos on Sunday was mocked for being billed as a tough one-on-one interrogation, considering Stephanopoulos once donated to the Clinton Foundation. Surprisingly, however, their conversation produced some hard-hitting moments that really placed the former secretary of state on her heels. Clinton deferred an answer, for instance, when Stephanopoulos asked her whether she’ll release her Wall Street transcripts. Another cringeworthy moment came when the ABC anchor pressed her on a controversial 9/11-related bill sponsored by Democratic New York Sen. Chuck Schumer.


Schumer’s bi-partisan Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism Act would allow 9/11 families to sue state sponsors of terrorism in federal court. It would particularly hold Saudi Arabia accountable. The Obama administration opposes it, claiming it will put Americans at legal risk overseas. This leaves Clinton with the uncomfortable position of having to side with Schumer ahead of Tuesday’s important Empire State primary, or the president. She pleaded the fifth, insisting she didn't have enough information.

Stephanopoulos: “So who’s right here, Senator Schumer or President Obama?”

Clinton: “I don't really know about that, George. I’ll have to look into it. Obviously, we’ve got to make anyone who participates in or supports terrorism pay a price, and we also have to be aware of any consequences that might affect Americans, either military or civilian or our nation. So, I’m not able to take a position on something…” 

Stephanopoulos expressed surprise Clinton wasn’t aware of legislation that has been around for several years, but Clinton simply repeated that she’ll “look into it.”

Despite not being fully versed on the legislation, it wasn’t minutes later that Clinton’s spokesman Nick Merrill tweeted that she was fully supportive of the bill. 


Considering Clinton’s quick turnaround, can voters really believe she took the time to study the text? Or, is she just making another politically convenient announcement a day out of the New York contest?

To be fair, Clinton’s opponent Bernie Sanders, who also appeared on ABC this weekend, has not taken a solid position on the legislation either, indicating he needs to take a closer look at its contents. Yet, he took a harder stance against Saudi Arabia, stating it is “playing a very dangerous role in fomenting fundamentalism all over the world."


Join the conversation as a VIP Member


Trending on Townhall Videos