A Woman in Brazil Thought Bridge Jumping Would Be Thrilling, but Her Instructors...
This Plaintiff Just Joined the Lawsuit Against Karen Bass Over the Palisades...
City Forces Orthodox Jew to Get Permit to Pray With Friends in Own...
Trump Is Setting His Sights on This Country After the Iran War Ends
Democrats Are Big Mad That Trump Ended the War in Iran
Where My Story Really Begins
West Virginia Lowers Permitless Carry Age to 18
Gavin Newsom Announced He's Being Investigated by the DOJ. Here's What We've Learned.
Elon Musk Is Now a Trillionaire. Here's Why That's a Good Thing.
Israel Weighs in on Iran Deal
No, America Is Not Providing Iran With a $300 Billion Reconstruction Fund
B-52 Crashes After Take-Off at Edwards Air Force Base
ICE Officer Struck by Suspect Van; Returns Fire
The FREE Act 'Frees' Permitting Stakeholders From Regulation
Giants Players Infuriate Sports Media by Promoting Bible Versus on 'Pride Night'
Tipsheet

Can Republicans Hold Obama Accountable for Bergdahl?

Can Republicans Hold Obama Accountable for Bergdahl?

For all the other controversy surounding Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl, President Obama's decision to release five Taliban leaders, without formally notifying Congress first, is almost universally understood to be illegal.

Advertisement

Sure, there are some people who argue that the law in question, the 2014 National Defense Authorization Act — specifically Section 1035, is an unconstitutional infringement of Obama's inherent Article II wartime powers.

However, if Obama believed that Section 1035 did infringe on his Article II war powers, then he should have vetoed the bill outright and demanded Congress pass it again without the offending provision. Either way, even those who say Obama acted within his constitutional rights, also admit that he violated the underlying statute.

Given that Obama acted illegally, what can Congress do about it?

Unfortunately not much.

The same statute that requires Obama to notify Congress of prisoner releases from Guantanamo also fails to create a penalty for the president should he (or she) violate the law.

So Obama could flagrantly violate this provision by emptying Guantanamo entirely and Congress could not do anything about it.

If this sounds crazy, and it is, it is absolutely normal for Washington. Congress has placed numerous requirements on the executive branch that carry zero consequences if they are not followed. The Budget and Accounting Act of 1921, for example, requires the president to submit a budget every year before the first Monday in February. Presidents often miss this deadline, however, because there simply is no penalty included in federal law.

Advertisement

Obama has taken particular advantage of this oversight by missing the deadline more than another president.

Some conservatives are pushing impeachment as a remedy for Obama's violation of Section 1035, but not only is that politically impossible with Democrats in control of the Senate, but it would also be too harsh a response for the wrongdoing involved.

Instead, Republicans should focus on denying funds to the relevant federal agencies until Obama begins following the law.

If Obama isn't enforcing immigration law, defund DHS. If Obama has said he plans to bailout Obamacare insurers, defund HHS until he says the risk corridor program will be run on a revenue neutral basis.

There are smaller steps Republicans can take to hold Obama accountable for breaking the law. And that applies to the Bergdahl situation too.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement