Democrats Totally Melted Down While Americans Celebrated 250 Years
What Happens Now? Mike Johnson Just Signaled the Next Move on Birthright Citizenship
New York Times Columnist Laments the 'Malaise' of America's 250th by Hoping to...
Mamdani's Post About a 'Gun' at a Mosque Is Missing Some Really Important...
Doug Burgum Embarrasses CNN's Dana Bash Over Reflecting Pool Vandal
Here's Why Abdul El-Sayed Says He Won't Support Chuck Schumer for Senate Majority...
Leftist Trolls Are Trying to Give UK World Cup Fan the Freddy Treatment
Here's How Mamdani's Wife Marked the Fourth of July
The Next Great American Frontier
New York City Has Tried Rent Freezes Before. Here's How They Ended.
Socialists Say Zohran Mamdani Delivered Record-Low Murders in NYC. There's Just One Proble...
Spencer Pratt Has a Message for Zohran Mamdani: 'F**k You Communists'
Tyler Robinson to Face Charlie Kirk’s Widow, Parents in Preliminary Hearing
Team USA Star Player Cleared to Play After FIFA Rejects Belgium’s Appeal
Faith, Opportunity, and the Future of America’s Forgotten Communities
Tipsheet

Can Republicans Hold Obama Accountable for Bergdahl?

Can Republicans Hold Obama Accountable for Bergdahl?

For all the other controversy surounding Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl, President Obama's decision to release five Taliban leaders, without formally notifying Congress first, is almost universally understood to be illegal.

Advertisement

Sure, there are some people who argue that the law in question, the 2014 National Defense Authorization Act — specifically Section 1035, is an unconstitutional infringement of Obama's inherent Article II wartime powers.

However, if Obama believed that Section 1035 did infringe on his Article II war powers, then he should have vetoed the bill outright and demanded Congress pass it again without the offending provision. Either way, even those who say Obama acted within his constitutional rights, also admit that he violated the underlying statute.

Given that Obama acted illegally, what can Congress do about it?

Unfortunately not much.

The same statute that requires Obama to notify Congress of prisoner releases from Guantanamo also fails to create a penalty for the president should he (or she) violate the law.

So Obama could flagrantly violate this provision by emptying Guantanamo entirely and Congress could not do anything about it.

If this sounds crazy, and it is, it is absolutely normal for Washington. Congress has placed numerous requirements on the executive branch that carry zero consequences if they are not followed. The Budget and Accounting Act of 1921, for example, requires the president to submit a budget every year before the first Monday in February. Presidents often miss this deadline, however, because there simply is no penalty included in federal law.

Advertisement

Obama has taken particular advantage of this oversight by missing the deadline more than another president.

Some conservatives are pushing impeachment as a remedy for Obama's violation of Section 1035, but not only is that politically impossible with Democrats in control of the Senate, but it would also be too harsh a response for the wrongdoing involved.

Instead, Republicans should focus on denying funds to the relevant federal agencies until Obama begins following the law.

If Obama isn't enforcing immigration law, defund DHS. If Obama has said he plans to bailout Obamacare insurers, defund HHS until he says the risk corridor program will be run on a revenue neutral basis.

There are smaller steps Republicans can take to hold Obama accountable for breaking the law. And that applies to the Bergdahl situation too.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement