Karoline Leavitt Wrecked This Lefty Reporter for His Awful Take on the Minneapolis...
Some Are Saying Nick Shirley's Latest Video on Somali Fraud Is Worse Than...
Wisconsin Cannot Afford to Follow Minnesota
HHS Secretary Kennedy Announces Healthcare Price Transparency
Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche Just Promised to Stop the 'Terrorism' of MN...
Experts Weigh in on SCOTUS Cases Involving Boys in Girls' Sports
Florida Woman Tried Messing With ICE. It Did Not Go Well for Her.
Is Socialism a Form of Moderation Amongst Democrats? A WaPo Columnist Thinks So
Tim Walz Walz Begs the White House to 'Turn Down the Temperature' After...
TX Congressional Candidate Claims to Be a Trump Ally, but His Record Shows...
Cea Weaver Describes Rent-Control As a Way to Cripple the Real Estate Market
Illinois Businessman Sentenced to Six Years for $55 Million Loan and PPP Fraud...
Tim Walz Calls ICE an ‘Occupation’ as Minneapolis Descends into Chaos
North Carolina Woman Sentenced to 6 Years in $12M Medicaid Fraud Scheme
Texas Doctor, Assistant Get Prison Time for $3M Healthcare Fraud Targeting Elderly
Tipsheet

Op-Ed Says That 'To Kill A Mockingbird' Might Teach Kids Sexual Assault Survivors Lie

NBC has published an op-ed with a rather interesting take on the Mississippi school district's decision to eliminate the book "To Kill A Mockingbird" from its curriculum. According to the author, the book probably shouldn't be discussed in classrooms, as it could "complicate the modern 'believe victims' movement." In the book, a character named Mayella Ewell, who is white, falsely accuses Tom Robinson, who is black, of raping her. Robinson is convicted of rape even when it becomes clear he is innocent of any crime. 

Advertisement

This, according to the op-ed, is problematic and could teach students that sometimes women lie about rape.  

And the book cannot continue to be taught as if every person in the classroom is white, upper middle class and needs to be prodded into being Scout. It should be taught by asking questions about why there are no black characters with agency in the novel, by wrapping it in with the history of the Scottsboro boys — a group of black teenagers falsely accused of raping two white women — and through raising questions about how "Mockingbird" (and American history) complicates the modern “believe victims” movement.

I'll concede that there are good points in the piece--the characters aren't exactly the most developed, and it's a relatively black-and-white book (in the metaphorical sense, not literal) when the real world is much more gray. There are certainly better books out there that would probably do a better job teaching the same lessons found in "Mockingbird," but one can't ignore the book's status as an American classic. 

Further, it's entirely possible to both support women who have been sexually assaulted and to read "To Kill a Mockingbird" in class. For one, "To Kill a Mockingbird" is a work of fiction. Sexual assault happens, but I hope schoolchildren are learning in a place other than an English classroom about what they should do if someone they know claims to have been sexually assaulted. It's also the sad truth that people sometimes lie about these things. (But again, English class isn't exactly the place where this discussion should be happening.) Treat fiction like fiction, not as a guide for life. 

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos