Here's Why Iran's Government Has Gotten Away With Tyranny
Trump Says He Is Concerned About the Midterm Elections
Her Baby's Bruise Sent This Mom to the Hospital. What Happened Next Shattered...
Don't Let Cea Weaver's Tears Fool You
Inside the Massachusetts Prison Where Women Live in Fear of 'Transgender' Inmates
Mamdani Voters Shrug at Venezuelan Immigrant's Warning Against Socialism
Guess Who Has Become a Propaganda Tool in Iran As the Regime Shuts...
Over a Dozen Oil Executives to Meet the President Trump As Venezuelan Oil...
'We Support Hamas Here,' Antisemitic Protest Erupts Outside Synagogue Near Jewish Day Scho...
The Gift of America and the Gift of Life
Automakers Eat Billion-Dollar Losses on Electric Vehicles
Texas AG Ken Paxton Shuts Down Taxpayer Funded 'Abortion Tourism'
$500K Stolen, 20 States Targeted: Detroit Man Admits Wire Fraud and Identity Theft
DHS to Surge 1,000 Additional Agents Into Minneapolis As Protests Escalate
Oklahoma Chiropractor Indicted in $30M Health Care Fraud and COVID Relief Theft Scheme
Tipsheet

Op-Ed Says That 'To Kill A Mockingbird' Might Teach Kids Sexual Assault Survivors Lie

NBC has published an op-ed with a rather interesting take on the Mississippi school district's decision to eliminate the book "To Kill A Mockingbird" from its curriculum. According to the author, the book probably shouldn't be discussed in classrooms, as it could "complicate the modern 'believe victims' movement." In the book, a character named Mayella Ewell, who is white, falsely accuses Tom Robinson, who is black, of raping her. Robinson is convicted of rape even when it becomes clear he is innocent of any crime. 

Advertisement

This, according to the op-ed, is problematic and could teach students that sometimes women lie about rape.  

And the book cannot continue to be taught as if every person in the classroom is white, upper middle class and needs to be prodded into being Scout. It should be taught by asking questions about why there are no black characters with agency in the novel, by wrapping it in with the history of the Scottsboro boys — a group of black teenagers falsely accused of raping two white women — and through raising questions about how "Mockingbird" (and American history) complicates the modern “believe victims” movement.

I'll concede that there are good points in the piece--the characters aren't exactly the most developed, and it's a relatively black-and-white book (in the metaphorical sense, not literal) when the real world is much more gray. There are certainly better books out there that would probably do a better job teaching the same lessons found in "Mockingbird," but one can't ignore the book's status as an American classic. 

Further, it's entirely possible to both support women who have been sexually assaulted and to read "To Kill a Mockingbird" in class. For one, "To Kill a Mockingbird" is a work of fiction. Sexual assault happens, but I hope schoolchildren are learning in a place other than an English classroom about what they should do if someone they know claims to have been sexually assaulted. It's also the sad truth that people sometimes lie about these things. (But again, English class isn't exactly the place where this discussion should be happening.) Treat fiction like fiction, not as a guide for life. 

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos