Bondi Terror Attack Survivor's Account on Baffling Police Response Will Leave You Seething
CNN Analyst Had a Brutal Line About the Dems' Approval Ratings
Trump's 'Patriot Games' Has Launched Yet Another Leftist Meltdown
Trump Administration Takes Huge Action Against These States Over Voter Data
The Trump Administration Just Suspended This Immigration Program After Brown University Sh...
Amid the Obamacare Debate, Pro-Life Org Calls for the Hyde Amendment to Apply...
Defending Education Files Title VI Complaint Against Portland Public Schools
J.K. Rowling Notices Labour's Misogyny Hypocrisy
Oh, Really? This Georgia County Admitted It Didn't Follow the Rules During the...
When Veterans Have to Break the Law to Heal, the Law Is Broken
Ben Shapiro Delivers a Fiery Moral Reckoning During His AmericaFest Speech
Dem Senate Candidate Says She Wouldn't Be Able to Control Herself, Would Assault...
Jasmine Crocket Would Make Kamala Harris Proud With Her Latest Word Salad
Erika Kirk and TPUSA Endorse JD Vance for 2028 at AmericaFest
FBI Charges Chinese National With Smuggling Deadly Bacteria Into US
Tipsheet

Court Dismisses Lawsuit That Would Have Forced Catholic Hospitals to Perform Abortions

A federal court has dismissed the case American Civil Liberties Union v. Trinity Health Corporation, which sought to force Catholic hospitals and staff members to perform abortions regardless of their religious beliefs or personal objections to the procedure.

Advertisement

The suit was filed by the ACLU in October of 2015. Trinity Health is one of the largest Catholic hospital systems in the country.

The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan, Southern Division, in its dismissal order in American Civil Liberties Union v. Trinity Health Corporation called the ACLU’s claims of harm from the hospital system’s pro-life position “dubious,” explaining that they haven’t satisfied the legal requirements to demonstrate such harm and therefore bring a lawsuit.

The court additionally found that, for those reasons and others, the lawsuit is not “ripe for review,” meaning that nothing has happened to warrant court action: “Obviously, pregnancy alone is not a ‘particular condition’ that requires the termination of said pregnancy. To find the claim to be ripe for review on the facts pleaded before this Court would be to grant a cause of action to every pregnant woman in the state of Michigan upon the date of conception. Accordingly, the alleged harm has not risen beyond a speculative nature and is not ripe for review.”

A good decision. Conscience rights need to be protected, and Catholic hospitals have a right to not be forced to violate their beliefs.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos