This City Councilman Turned a $50K Deal Into a Personal Payday. Now He's...
Meet the Conservative Outsider Who Wants to Bring Common Sense Back to His...
How This Small-Town Police Force Became a 'Criminal Organization'
Iranian Regime's Latest Move Shows How Desperate It Has Become
CBS News Tried to Recalibrate Detention Stats — DHS Was Having None of...
If 'The Only Thing More Powerful Than Hate Is Love' Democrats Missed the...
Elites Did Their Part to Fight Global Warming by Flying Dozens of Private...
Historic: U.S. Marks Ninth Month With Zero Releases at the Border
Man Who Pushed Propaganda About a Young Gazan Boy Slaughtered By The IDF...
Harry Sisson Refuses to House Illegals in His Home, And Claims ICE Agent...
Critics Blast Katie Porter's Pre Super Bowl X Post As She Tries to...
Immigration Win: Federal Court Sides With Trump Admin on TPS Terminations for Multiple...
Federal Judge Blocks California Effort to Demask ICE Agents
Jasmine Crockett Might Be Running the Most Incompetent Campaign in History
WaPo Claims That Bad Bunny's Profane Performance Represented 'Wholesome Family Values'
Tipsheet

No Equal Protection at Obama's DOJ?

This is information that should get wide coverage before the elections in ten days. 

Today's Washington Post offers a damning report by Jerry Markon and Krissah Thompson about race-conscious enforcement of the law in Eric Holder's Justice Department. 
Advertisement


The upshot?  The "powers that be" in charge of the Department think civil rights laws are only to be used to protect minorities, not white people, even when whites' rights are being violated.

Here's one snippet:

Civil rights officials from the Bush administration have said that enforcement should be race-neutral. But some officials from the Obama administration, which took office vowing to reinvigorate civil rights enforcement, thought the agency should focus primarily on cases filed on behalf of minorities.


Civil rights officials from the Bush administration have said that enforcement should be race-neutral. But some officials from the Obama administration, which took office vowing to reinvigorate civil rights enforcement, thought the agency should focus primarily on cases filed on behalf of minorities.

"The Voting Rights Act was passed because people like Bull Connor were hitting people like John Lewis, not the other way around," said one Justice Department official not authorized to speak publicly. . ..

Ha!  Look who's espousing "original intent" now.  But wait; there's more:

"There are career people who feel strongly that it is not the voting section's job to protect white voters," the [Justice Department] lawyer said. "The environment is that you better toe the line of traditional civil rights ideas or you better keep quiet about it, because you will not advance, you will not receive awards and you will be ostracized."

Advertisement

Related:

CONSTITUTION

In other words, there are people in the Obama Justice Department who do not believe in the equal protection of the law as enshrined in our Constitution.  The essence of that guarantee is that laws' protections apply equally to all citizens, regardless of race.  It would be outrageous if government lawyers refused to enforce the law to protect African Americans or any other minority because of their minority status; it's outrageous if they refuse to do so on behalf of whites -- because they are white.

And it's just one more reason why we need a Congress that's willing to take a look at what seems like some pretty hard-core racialism in the Justice Department.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement