So Who's To Blame?

Asthis Washington Times editorial notes, there is a sweeping contrast in MSM coverage of the anti-Arizona immigration bill protests and the Tea Parties. One participant referred to the police as "pigs," some threw rocks and bottles at authorities -- and there's much, much more.

If the MSM thought that talk radio spurred Oklahoma City terrorism, and Bill Clinton thinks the Tea Partiers' message is in danger of "crossing the line" to incite similar violence, then whom, pray tell, is responsible for any violence that erupts during the anti-Arizona protests? Could it be the man who characterized the bill as likely to:

undermine basic notions of fairness that we cherish as Americans, as well as the trust between police and their communities that is so crucial to keeping us safe. ?

That is, President Obama. If any non-left-wing violence can somehow be pinned on the Tea Party, shouldn't any left-wing violence on immigration -- coming after the President's words -- be attributed to him?