Notice Where and When This CNN Panel on Immigration Fell Apart
I’m a Racist, He’s a Racist, She’s a Racist, Wouldn’t You Like to...
Who Are We in Their Presence?
A Quick Bible Study Vol. 298: It’s ‘Messiah’ Time Again
Why Leftist Film Societies Cancelled Nuremburg
The Season Was Made for Remembering
America’s Foster Care Crisis Demands a Return to Faith, Family, and Community
A Call to Remember the Persecuted Christians
Restoring a Generation’s Love for Faith and Country
Ypres, Human Rights Day, and Iran's Martyrs: Why Memory Is a Moral Duty
Hollywood Director Convicted of Blowing $11M Meant for Sci-Fi Show on Stocks and...
Tim Walz Downplays $1 Billion Fraud Scandal
13-Year-Old Arrested at Minnesta School With 1,500 Suspected Fentanyl Pills
ISIS Gunman Kills 2 US Soldiers, 1 US Interpreter in Syria; 3 Others...
North Carolina Worker Pleads Guilty to Stealing $102K in Food Benefits
Tipsheet

Hardly a Surprise

Today, the Washington Post reports, in effect, that Sonia Sotomayor doesn't seem either to grasp or else to honor by the distinction between a trial judge and an appellate one
Advertisement
.

Can anyone truly be surprised?  Sotomayor is "empathetic" -- she doesn't understand that a judge's role isn't to make policy; it's to interpet the law.  If she's willing to ignore a judge's role altogether, why would she bother abiding by the traditional understanding of the different roles of a trial and appellate judge?

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement