Jamie Raskin's Low Opinion of Women
Thank You, GOD!
Trump Slams Bad Bunny's Horrendous Halftime Show
Federal Judge Sentences Abilene Drug Trafficker to Life for Fentanyl Distribution
The Turning Point Halftime Show Crushed Expectations
Jeffries Calls Citizenship Proof ‘Voter Suppression’ as Majority of Americans Back Voter I...
Four Reasons Why the Washington Post Is Dying
Foreign-Born Ohio Lawmaker Pushes 'Sensitive Locations' Bill to Limit ICE Enforcement
TrumpRx Triggers TDS in Elizabeth Warren
Texas Democrat Goes Viral After Pitting Whites Against Minorities
U.S. Secret Service Seized 3 Card Skimmers in Alabama, Stopping $3.1M in Fraud
Jasmine Crockett Finally Added Some Policy to Her Website and It Was a...
No Sanctuary in the Sanctuary
Chromosomes Matter — and Women’s Sports Prove It
The Economy Will Decide Congress — If Republicans Actually Talk About It
Tipsheet

Tougher Than It Looks From the Outside

Contrary to its previous promises, the Obama Administration has reversed its pledge to end military tribunal trials for terrorists.

It seems the real world implications of trying terrorists in federal court -- for example, having to let someone like Khalid Sheikh Muhammed go free because he wasn't read his Miranda rights! -- is enough to sober even the naifs at The White House.
Advertisement


Remarkably (but perhaps not surprisingly), the linked Post account insists that the Obama tribunals will be new and improved . . . for example, offering detainees a greater choice of lawyers.

But what's remarkable is how far Obama has come from his campaign position that terrorists should have access either to American federal courts or military courts martial.    As with Guantanamo, the President seems to be learning that it's a lot easier to second guess and criticize from the sidelines than it is to have to make the hard decisions.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement