'Iron Lung' and the Future of Filmmaking
These Athletes Are Getting Paid to Shame Their Own Country at the Olympics
WaPo CEO Resigns Days After Laying Off 300 Employees
Georgia's Jon Ossoff Says Trump Administration Imitates Rhetoric of 'History's Worst Regim...
U.S. Thwarts $4 Million Weapons Plot Aimed at Toppling South Sudan Government
Minnesota Mom, Daughter, and Relative Allegedly Stole $325k from SNAP
Michigan AG: Detroit Man Stole 12 Identities to Collect Over $400,000 in Public...
Does Maxine Waters Really Think Trump Will Be Bothered by Her Latest Tantrum?
Fifth Circuit Rules That Some Illegal Aliens Can Be Detained Without Bond Until...
Just Days After Mass Layoffs, WaPo Returns to Lying About the Trump Admin
Nigerian Man Sentenced to Over 8 Years for International Inheritance Fraud Targeting Elder...
Florida's Crackdown on Non-English Speaking Drivers Is Hilarious
Family Fraud: Father, Two Daughters Convicted in $500k USDA Nutrition Program Scam
American Olympians Bash Their Own Country As Democrats and Media Gush
Speculation Into Iran Strike Continues As Warplanes Are Pulled From Super Bowl Flyover...
Tipsheet

The "Windy Ticket"

Listening to some of the campaign coverage of Joe Biden this morning, one would be tempted to believe that Barack had made one of the greatest veep picks ever.  Of course, favorable coverage is expected at this juncture.  But at risk of being the skunk at the garden party, many of the claims are simply mistaken, in my view.
Advertisement


As a general matter, if it's a bad thing that John McCain is 71 years old, supposedly too focused on foreign policy, and (as Obamaphiles like to claim) a "Washington insider," then why did Barack go out and choose a 66 year old running mate, whose supposed area of expertise is foreign policy, and who has an even longer tenure than McCain in the Senate but with fewer legislative achievements to his credit? 

More specifically, look at his alleged expertise when it comes to foreign policy.  Biden supported the war -- getting what Barack would characterize as the biggest "judgment" issue wrong.  Then he fecklessly tried to repeal the authorization he had supported, even as the war raged.  As even Mother Jones notes, Biden's plan to partition Iraq along sectarian lines (before the surge succeeded) could well have given rise to more, rather than less, ethnic conflict. 

We're also hearing -- as an alleged big plus for Barack -- about the fact that Joe Biden is a Catholic.  Not so fast.  So was John Kerry -- and yet he won a smaller share of the Catholic vote than Al Gore had.  Biden's Catholicism also allows for a discussion of how a supposedly practicing Catholic could embrace a pro-abortion rights extremist like Barack.

Last night, before the pick was announced, John King --sitting in for Anderson Cooper -- noted approvingly that Biden was the poorest guy in the Senate.  That was certainly true as of 2006; more recently, according to CNN, his net worth was minus $300,000.  Before anyone gets carried away with extolling Biden's common-manness, are we really supposed to trust with the federal budget a guy who's running a personal deficit, despite a Senate salary of more than $165,000 per year?  After all, in Obama's view, since Biden makes more than $150,000, he's more than middle class.  And if we're all going to play the house-size/class warfare game, judging from the looks of his mother's house on TV this morning, he shouldn't be hurting.

Finally, as bloggers will gleefully catalog in days to come, for someone who is supposed to impart "gravitas" to the Obama ticket, Biden suffers from a raging case of verbal dysentary. 

Perhaps there's some poetic appropriateness in a candidate from Chicago -- who's most notable for his rhetorical skill -- putting together the "Windy Ticket."

Advertisement

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement