About That 'Racist' Video the Trump Team Posted Featuring the Obamas...It's a Fake...
'You’re Next, N****r': White Progs in Minneapolis Go Full Kul Klux Klan on...
Over 800 Google Workers Demand the Company Cut Ties With ICE
Federal Judge Just Blocked Another Trump Administration Immigration Policy
What Could Go Wrong? AOC Plans to Train 'Legal Observers' to Monitor ICE...
UNL Student Government Passes SJP-Backed Israel Divestment Resolution
AOC Mourns the Loss of ’Our Media,’ More Layoffs Across the Industry (and...
The Left Just Doesn't Understand Why WaPo Is Failing
16 Years and $16 Billion Later the First Railhead Goes Down for CA's...
Illegal Immigrant Allegedly Used Stolen Identity to Vote and Collect $400K in Federal...
$26 Billion Gone: Stellantis Joins Automakers Retreating From EVs
House Oversight Chair: Clintons Don’t Get Special Treatment in Epstein Probe
Utah Man Sentenced for Stealing Funds Meant to Aid Ukrainian First Responders
Ex-Bank Employee Pleads Guilty to Laundering $8M for Overseas Criminal Organization
State Department Orders Evacuation of US Citizens in Iran As Possibility of Military...
Tipsheet

Barack's Writing Unearthed

Ben Smith found Barack's unsigned case comment from Volume 103 of the Harvard Law Review.

It's the only piece of legal writing of his that's been found, so far.  Even that was the subject of some pretty fancy footwork on the part of the campaign staff --  which, as Smith notes, had told everyone that as the
Advertisement
Review's President, Barack "didn't write articles, he edited and reviewed them."

Yes, well, given the Review's publication schedule (at least at the time), this was written in around August of 1989, published in November of '89, and Barack became President in February of 1990.

The case comment discusses Stallman v. Youngquist, an Illinois case that declined to find a cause of action against mothers for mothers for the unintentional infliction of injuries to their infants before their birth. 

In Smith's piece, legal scholars note the "moderation" of the language in the comment.  Well, given the Review's editing process it would have gone through -- it's written, then the supervising editor edits it, then the president looks at it, then the executive editor edits it, and then it's printed -- that doesn't really reveal much.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos