BREAKING: As Defeat Sets In, Hamas Plays Games With Ceasefire 'Agreement'
In Defiance of Biden, Israel Prepares to Finish Hamas
An American Tourist Has Been Killed in Mexico
With Latest Move, Columbia Again Caves to Pro-Terrorism Mob
This Democrat Just Got Busted for Putting Dead People on Election Petition
Another Boeing Whistleblower Has Died
Why Everyone Thinks Biden Had an Accident in Front of the Press Corps
Don Lemon: The DEI Stuff Has Gone Off the Rails
GW President Is Suddenly Very Concerned About the Pro-Terrorist Camp on Her Campus
Biden Says 'Never Again' While Withholding Military Aid to Israel
Border Crossing Where Humanitarian Aid Enters Gaza Has Been Blown Up. Guess Who's...
'Weakness Is on Display': New Trump Video Hits Biden for Botched Response to...
'Guillotine, Guillotine:' Pro-Hamas Goons on Campus Now Calling for Executions
Disgraced Ex-Prosecutor Nathan Wade Is Speaking Out About His Affair With Fani Willis
Guess Who's Funding the Pro-Hamas Hate Rallies and Encampments?
Tipsheet

A Regrettable Necessity

Junior high school students in Mesa, Arizona are protesting a school policy banning hugs that last longer than 2 seconds.

On its face, the policy sounds silly.  But there's a reason for it -- including the fact that close to 1/3 of the school's students were concerned about public displays of affection (PDA) in the school halls.
Advertisement


When I was writing Prude, I learned that in junior high schools all over the country, there are PDA's going on that are clearly inappropriate in an academic setting (and in some cases, inappropriate anywhere, given the tender age of the participants).  The behavior only contributes to a highly-sexualized atmosphere -- one in which boys are actually willing to approach girls they know only casually and graphically solicit sex.

Apparently, parents are "split" over the merits of the 2-second hug policy, and that's part of the problem.  Such a policy is, sadly, necessary in the first place because young people aren't being taught -- no doubt by some of the parents opposing the policy -- about what constitutes acceptable behavior.  As a result, hard-and-fast rules have to be put into place, and everyone's freedom is formally constrained as a result.
Advertisement


In a sense, the whole episode is a perfect example of what happens when informal social sanctions against inappropriate sexual behaviors are eroded. Simply to keep order and enforce some standards of behavior, the "government" (in this case, school authorities) have to get involved and make hard-and-fast laws (in this case, rules) that end up imposing one more layer of top-down control over people's behavior.

The policy is probably necessary -- but that's a shame, isn't it?

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement