Gavin Newsom Is Many Things. 'Pro-Family' Is Not One of Them.
Rep. Tom Tiffany Introduces Legislation to End Birthright Citizenship Loophole Being Explo...
Is This PA Congressional Candidate Already Living the D.C. Insider Lifestyle?
Oregon Senate Committee Guts Gun Control Bill
President Trump Blasts Tucker Carlson: 'He’s Not MAGA'
GOP Rep Defends American Foreign Policy, Explains Why Operation Epic Fury Was Inevitable
Senator Tim Sheehy Helps to Forcibly Remove Crazed Protester During Senate Hearing
Wisconsin Congressional Candidate Rebecca Cooke Flees When Confronted About Her Stance on...
State Department Says That U.S., Venezuela Have Re-Established Diplomatic Relations
Federal Court Sentences Illegal Alien to Prison for $343K SNAP Benefits Fraud
CENTCOM: U.S. Has Destroyed More Than 30 Iranian Ships
NY AG Letitia James Sues Video Game Maker Over Loot Boxes
New Jersey Man Pleads Guilty in $600M Nationwide Catalytic Converter Theft Ring
U.S. House Rejects Resolution to Stop Strikes on Iran
Juror Bribery Plot in Feeding Our Future Fraud Trial Leads to 57-Month Sentence
Tipsheet
Premium

Judge Grants Asylum Seekers Access to Attorneys

Judge Grants Asylum Seekers Access to Attorneys
AP Photo/Rodrigo Abd

U.S. District Judge Dana Sabraw expanded access to legal counsel for detained migrants claiming asylum in the United States. Fox 5 San Diego reports the Bush-appointed judge handed down the decision on Tuesday, ruling that migrants may consult with attorneys ahead of their non-refoulment interviews, where migrants have a chance to argue that they face potential harm or persecution in the event that they are returned to Mexico. 

(Via Fox 5 San Diego) 

Sabraw previously ruled that a Guatemalan family at the heart of the case — who alleged they had been assaulted numerous times at gunpoint on their way to the U.S. — be provided access to legal counsel, but Tuesday’s ruling expands attorney access to all people detained in U.S. Customs and Border Protection custody awaiting non-refoulement interviews.

“Given the stakes of a non-refoulement interview — the return to a country in which one may face persecution and torture — and the interview’s fact-intensive nature, it is undeniable that access to counsel is important,” Sabraw wrote in his ruling.

The case is one of several filed in San Diego federal court regarding the Trump administration’s “Migrant Protection Protocols” or “Remain in Mexico” program, a policy keeping asylum seekers out of the U.S. while they await the conclusion of their immigration proceedings.

Migrants such as the Guatemalan family of seven have argued they are not safe waiting in Mexico for their case to be resolved. Though the family was successful in its non-refoulement interviews and released to the United States late last year, the ACLU Foundation of San Diego and Imperial counties alleges that more than 60,000 asylum seekers have been forced to wait in Mexico until their cases are processed.

After thousands of migrants stampeded their way to the U.S. border, the Trump administration implemented its "Remain in Mexico" program, which has significantly abated the flow of migrants seeking asylum in the United States. 

According to a recent assessment by the Department of Homeland Security, apprehensions at the border are way down, credible asylum claims are being processed quicker and thousands of asylum seekers have abandoned their claims after being instructed to wait in Mexico. Apparently, for many, things really weren't all that bad in their home countries after all. 

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement