Biden Campaign Responds to Reports He's Dropping Out
HUGE RNC SALE: 60% Off VIP Membership - Ends Today!
Biden Faces More Than Bad Polling and a Total Dem Rebellion. His Campaign...
Was This the Most Shameful Liberal Media Moment From the Republican Convention?
It Looks Like Bill Maher May Be Right About Biden
New Battleground Polling Conducted After Trump Assassination Attempt Has Dropped
Biden Would Consider Dropping Out If...
Reid: Biden Recovering From COVID Is 'Exactly the Same' As Trump Surviving Assassination...
Here’s What Trump’s Family, Republican Lawmakers Said About His Injury From the Assasinati...
The Significance of Nikki Haley's RNC Speech
Reflections on the 30th Anniversary of the AIMA Bombing
Here’s What Joe Scarborough Now Says About Biden Staying in the Race
Is This It for Biden? New Report Hints at When the President Will...
UPDATE: Officials Make Significant Misstep in Investigation Into Trump Assassination Attem...
There's Been an Update on the Vice Presidential Debate
Tipsheet
Premium

Judge Grants Asylum Seekers Access to Attorneys

AP Photo/Rodrigo Abd

U.S. District Judge Dana Sabraw expanded access to legal counsel for detained migrants claiming asylum in the United States. Fox 5 San Diego reports the Bush-appointed judge handed down the decision on Tuesday, ruling that migrants may consult with attorneys ahead of their non-refoulment interviews, where migrants have a chance to argue that they face potential harm or persecution in the event that they are returned to Mexico. 

(Via Fox 5 San Diego) 

Sabraw previously ruled that a Guatemalan family at the heart of the case — who alleged they had been assaulted numerous times at gunpoint on their way to the U.S. — be provided access to legal counsel, but Tuesday’s ruling expands attorney access to all people detained in U.S. Customs and Border Protection custody awaiting non-refoulement interviews.

“Given the stakes of a non-refoulement interview — the return to a country in which one may face persecution and torture — and the interview’s fact-intensive nature, it is undeniable that access to counsel is important,” Sabraw wrote in his ruling.

The case is one of several filed in San Diego federal court regarding the Trump administration’s “Migrant Protection Protocols” or “Remain in Mexico” program, a policy keeping asylum seekers out of the U.S. while they await the conclusion of their immigration proceedings.

Migrants such as the Guatemalan family of seven have argued they are not safe waiting in Mexico for their case to be resolved. Though the family was successful in its non-refoulement interviews and released to the United States late last year, the ACLU Foundation of San Diego and Imperial counties alleges that more than 60,000 asylum seekers have been forced to wait in Mexico until their cases are processed.

After thousands of migrants stampeded their way to the U.S. border, the Trump administration implemented its "Remain in Mexico" program, which has significantly abated the flow of migrants seeking asylum in the United States. 

According to a recent assessment by the Department of Homeland Security, apprehensions at the border are way down, credible asylum claims are being processed quicker and thousands of asylum seekers have abandoned their claims after being instructed to wait in Mexico. Apparently, for many, things really weren't all that bad in their home countries after all. 

Sponsored

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement