Thom Tillis Had a Total Meltdown During Today's Hearing With Kristi Noem
Top Dem Was Asked About Nancy Pelosi's Past Remarks About Unilateral Bombings...and It...
OpenAI Adds Surveillance Ban in Deal With Pentagon
Guess How Many Iranian Targets the US and Israel Hit Within 72 Hours
Supreme Court Ruling on California's Anti-Parental Rights Policy Regarding Trans-Identifie...
Another Somali Fraudster Just Pleaded Guilty to Stealing $6M in Autism Center Scheme
China Is Refusing to Help Iran Fight, but Is Offering This Instead
Outrage Erupts Over Kentucky Gun Store's Opening, Now Do Mosques
Don't Let Congress Ruin College Sports
Will Megyn Kelly Kindly Shut the Heck Up?
Megyn Kelly Claims US Troops Who Died in Operation Epic Fury Died for...
Rep. Massie and Others Claim Israel Forced Our Hand. Here's Why That Isn't...
Iran Has Reportedly Chosen Their Next Supreme Leader, but He Might Already Be...
Soros-Backed Liberal Prosecutor to Drag the Heroes Who Ended Austin's Islamic Terror Attac...
U.S. Consulate in Dubai Set Ablaze After Possible Drone Attack
Tipsheet
Premium

Judge Grants Asylum Seekers Access to Attorneys

Judge Grants Asylum Seekers Access to Attorneys
AP Photo/Rodrigo Abd

U.S. District Judge Dana Sabraw expanded access to legal counsel for detained migrants claiming asylum in the United States. Fox 5 San Diego reports the Bush-appointed judge handed down the decision on Tuesday, ruling that migrants may consult with attorneys ahead of their non-refoulment interviews, where migrants have a chance to argue that they face potential harm or persecution in the event that they are returned to Mexico. 

(Via Fox 5 San Diego) 

Sabraw previously ruled that a Guatemalan family at the heart of the case — who alleged they had been assaulted numerous times at gunpoint on their way to the U.S. — be provided access to legal counsel, but Tuesday’s ruling expands attorney access to all people detained in U.S. Customs and Border Protection custody awaiting non-refoulement interviews.

“Given the stakes of a non-refoulement interview — the return to a country in which one may face persecution and torture — and the interview’s fact-intensive nature, it is undeniable that access to counsel is important,” Sabraw wrote in his ruling.

The case is one of several filed in San Diego federal court regarding the Trump administration’s “Migrant Protection Protocols” or “Remain in Mexico” program, a policy keeping asylum seekers out of the U.S. while they await the conclusion of their immigration proceedings.

Migrants such as the Guatemalan family of seven have argued they are not safe waiting in Mexico for their case to be resolved. Though the family was successful in its non-refoulement interviews and released to the United States late last year, the ACLU Foundation of San Diego and Imperial counties alleges that more than 60,000 asylum seekers have been forced to wait in Mexico until their cases are processed.

After thousands of migrants stampeded their way to the U.S. border, the Trump administration implemented its "Remain in Mexico" program, which has significantly abated the flow of migrants seeking asylum in the United States. 

According to a recent assessment by the Department of Homeland Security, apprehensions at the border are way down, credible asylum claims are being processed quicker and thousands of asylum seekers have abandoned their claims after being instructed to wait in Mexico. Apparently, for many, things really weren't all that bad in their home countries after all. 

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos