It's Not the Iowa Poll That Has Frank Luntz Gobsmacked
Bill Maher Had to Call Out This 'Zombie Lie' When Interviewing a Black...
CNN Guest Highlights Biden's Latest 'Hail Mary' Move, and Why It Won't Work
Biden Summons His Top Guys to Make Sure He Doesn't Get Obliterated by...
Joe Biden Is the ‘Cheap Fake’
Narcissistic Leftists Are Afraid Trump Will Treat Them How They’ve Treated Trump
Hewitt Identifies the One Crucial Aspect About Trump Those on His VP Short...
Here's Which State Just Became the First in the Nation to Require 10...
Dr. Scott Atlas Gives It Right Back After Potshot From Fauci
55 Years of Joe Biden
The Democratic Subversion of Democracy
The Transcript Is Here for Biden's Amnesty Announcement, and It Doesn't Help the...
Juneteenth - Thanks, But No Thanks
The Most Detestable Action of Any President in My Lifetime
A Judenrein West
Tipsheet

Obama Without a Teleprompter

When Barack Obama doesn't have a teleprompter he's prone to giving some disastrous explanations for his decisions.

Yesterday, Obama signaled he may "defer" his tax-hiking economic proposals because he knew it could hurt the economy. This is the intro and his own statement from a segment on CNBC yesterday:
Advertisement

CNBC'S JOHN HARWOOD: I found this fascinating, Maria, that on the issue of taxes, he looked to insulate himself by saying that if, in fact, economic conditions justify the fact that it might harm the economy, he might be willing to hold off some of his tax increases when he takes office in January. Let's take a listen to Barack Obama.
OBAMA: Some of those, you could possibly defer. But I think the basic principle of restoring fairness to our economy and encouraging bottom-up economic growth is important. So here's what we know: We know that over the last decade or so, that more than half of the economic growth has been captured by the top one percent of U.S. citizens. That means the other 99 percent have seen their effective incomes go down. That is not a recipe for long- term economic growth.
Today, Obama was asked about his "vetter" Jim Johnson.
ABC News' Sunlen Miller asked  Obama how he could "rail against Countrywide Financial Corp as an example of insiders and today's economy while your VP search is headed by someone who got questionable loans from Countrywide?"

Obama's answer?
Advertisement
It didn't matter because Johnson wasn't getting paid and vetting is a "discreet task."

"These aren’t folks who are working for me," Obama said. "They're not people you know who I have assigned to a job in a future administration and, you know, ultimately my assumption is that, you know, this is a discreet task that they're going to performing for me over the next two months."

That's an interesting standard. I suppose Rev. Wright, Ayers, Dohn, Rezko, etc didn't matter because he wasn't paying them either?!?

Update: Video from Obama's presser w/ Johnson question.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement