UNL Student Government Passes SJP-Backed Israel Divestment Resolution
How Long Can America Go on Like This?
Intrusive Bankers and Government Overreach
Trump’s America First Dealmaking on AI Export Controls
Washington Post Layoffs Mark Long-Awaited Decline of Regime Media
Biology and Common Sense Triumph Over Radical Transgender Ideology
Respect the Badge. Enforce the Law but Fix the System.
In the Super Bowl of Drug Ads, Trump’s FDA Plays the Long Game...
From Open Borders to Ruinous Powderkegs
New Musical Remakes Anne Frank As a Genderqueer Hip-Hop Star
Toledo Man Indicted for Threatening to Kill Vice President JD Vance During Ohio...
Fort Lauderdale Financial Advisor Sentenced to 20 Years for $94M International Ponzi Schem...
FCC Is Reportedly Investigating The View
Illegal Immigrant Allegedly Used Stolen Identity to Vote and Collect $400K in Federal...
$26 Billion Gone: Stellantis Joins Automakers Retreating From EVs
Tipsheet

Public Financing

Over on Glamour magazine's political blog we are having some good discussion on why matching funds are bad for presidential campaigns.

Here's a part of what I posted yesterday:
Advertisement


"In theory, public financing would level the playing field between Obama, who raised $37 million in January alone, and cash-strapped McCain—exactly what those who cheer public financing think the system should do. (Never mind for now how outrageous it is to ask taxpayers to pony up $85 million for a candidate they may not even support.) The problem is that in a high-stakes presidential election, no one really wants to level the playing field, except the underdog. This explains why Obama thought it was so great before he found his fundraising groove. "

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement