CBP and ICE Chiefs Faced Off Against Unhinged Dems...and One Said the Quiet...
Democrat Presidential Hopeful Has Been Telling Some Weird Lies About His Ancestor and...
DOJ Charges Two Men in $120 Million Adult Day Care Fraud Scheme
This GOP Governor Just Shot Down a Bill That Would Have Banned Biological...
Chewing the Fat on the Left's 'Body Positivity' Flip Flop
National Nurses Union Calls for the Abolition of ICE
While Her Senate Rivals Campaign Statewide, Haley Stevens Hides From Voters
Delaware Smacked Down for Trying to Enforce Law, Ignoring Injunction
Tensions Rise At the White House's New Religious Liberty Commission as One Member...
Mike Johnson Blasts Mamdani's DOH for Creating a ‘Global Oppression’ Group Focused on...
Kentucky Senate Candidate Andy Barr Endorses Pro-Amnesty Book Despite Pledging to Be ‘Amer...
Democrat Attacks Christians, Calls Muslim Jihad on the West a 'Middle Eastern Version...
Even CNN Knows That Democrats Are on the Wrong Side of the Voter...
Ken Paxton Notches Immigration Win As Premier Community for Illegals Pays Out $68...
This Congressman's Inquiry Into Bad Bunny's Explicit Performance Has the Libs Screaming
Tipsheet

Feminists Battle Transgenders in U.K. vs U.N. Brouhaha

There is a kerfuffle in the United Kingdom that pits feminists against trans-people, and it all deals with whether or not the United Nations is being inclusive enough by labeling mothers as “pregnant women.” 

Advertisement

Recently, Britain proposed amendments to the United Nation’s International Covenant on Civil and Political rights that would change the clause that says “pregnant women” should be protected to “pregnant people” should be protected.  The British government fears that not changing the term to an all inclusive one will “exclude transgender people who have given birth.” In other words, it will neglect to protect women who identify as men that are pregnant. 

But feminists argue that this move is simply the transgender movement extending and embracing the patriarchal society and further removing women from the conversation.

Leading feminist writer  Sarah Ditum heavily criticized the move, “This isn’t inclusion. This is making women unmentionable. Having a female body and knowing what that means for reproduction doesn’t make you ‘exclusionary’. Forcing us to decorously scrub out any reference to our sex on pain of being called bigots is an insult.”

This actually highlights a growing problem on the left between feminists and transgender activists. Feminists take offense to the transgender’s movement desire to remove all gender form the public sphere because it, well, removes women from the public sphere as well.

Advertisement

Related:

TRANSGENDER WOMEN

Earlier this year, a fight actually broke out at a skirmish between feminist leaders and transgenders leaders. Trans-Exclusionary Radical Feminists (TERFs) is a British group that believes trans-women are not actually women and therefor should not be given the same legal protections as actual women. At a rally, that group got in a fist fight with trans-activists who opposed their mission.

But the desire by the British to change the U.N. Treaty seems rather silly, there have been only two known cases in the United Kingdom where children are born to women who transitioned to men but kept their reproductive organs.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos