Are Buttigieg’s Latest Airline Rules Going to Get People Killed?
These Ugly, Little Schmucks Need to Face Consequences
Top Biden Aides Didn't Have Anything Nice to Say About Karine Jean-Pierre: Report
The Terrorists Are Running the Asylum
Biden Responds to Trump's Challenge to Debate Before November
KJP Avoids Being DOA Due to DEI
Senior Sounds Off After USC Cancels Its Main Graduation Ceremony
NYPD Chief Has a Message for 'Entitled Hateful Students:' 'You’re Fired'
Blinken Warns About China's Influence on the Presidential Election
Trump's Attorneys Find Holes In Witnesses' 'Catch-and-Kill' Testimony
Southern California Official Makes Stunning Admission About the Border Crisis
Another State Will Not Comply With Biden's Rewrite of Title IX
'Lack of Clarity and Moral Leadership': NY Senate GOP Leader Calls Out Democratic...
Liberals Freak Out As Another So-Called 'Don't Say Gay Bill' Pops Up
Here’s Why One University Postponed a Pro-Hamas Protest
Tipsheet

WSJ Columnist Torches Claim Peddled By Kavanaugh Accuser's Attorney That GOP 'Blew Off Call' With Them

The Brett Kavanaugh Supreme Court nomination fight is about to enter a nasty phase. It’s ironic. Politics is always a gutter game, though voters don’t like seeing the mud slinging. The fact of the matter is that it works. Right now, the Democrats are slinging a lot of crap towards the GOP and Brett Kavanaugh ever since two women came forward with allegations of sexual misconduct. 

Advertisement

Christine Blasey Ford alleges a drunken 17-year-old Kavanaugh tried to sexually assault her at a high school party. Deborah Ramirez alleges Kavanaugh exposed himself at a party during his Yale years. Both instances have no corroborative witnesses. Those listed as potential witnesses have refuted the accounts of the accusers. Key details are missing—and it’s not like these allegations were dredged up two months ago. Sen. Dianne Feinstein’s (D-CA) office put this thing into motion by referring a letter written by Ford about the allegation to the FBI. Her office received the letter in July, but sat on it for weeks, keeping it from her Senate colleagues. The timing is what makes the entire episode suspect. It broke during zero hour, just days from the committee vote. 

Ramirez’s story is so shallow and shoddy that The New York Times, unlike The New Yorker, refused to do a formal story because they couldn’t confirm anything. These stories are unprovable, unsubstantiated gossip, but they’ve been weaponized because Democrats hate Trump, Kavanaugh, and they’re desperate to avoid being decapitated by their base who demand resistance to this White House, even going so far as to shred due process and individual rights because they’re still sour and incensed over their 2016 loss. 

So, she also has a lawyer, John Clune, who went on anti-Trump CNN to bash Republicans for reportedly refusing to speak with them, giving them the runaround:

Advertisement

John Clune, the attorney for the woman accusing Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh of exposing himself to her when they were in college, said only Democrats showed up for a phone call they had scheduled with Senate Judiciary Committee staff earlier Tuesday

Clune also said in an interview Tuesday on CNN's "Anderson Cooper 360" that Republicans seem to be "game-playing" and changing the rules for their communications.

Clune represents Deborah Ramirez, 53, who attended Yale with Kavanaugh and told Ronan Farrow and Jane Mayer of The New Yorker that she remembers Kavanaugh exposing himself to her at a dormitory party. Kavanaugh denies the allegation.

Clune told Anderson Cooper that his team has had a number of email communications with the committee, "but the difficulty is every time we try to set up a phone call, the majority party either changes the rules of the phone call or they want additional information as a condition of even having a phone call with us."

"We finally had a phone call scheduled for 7 o'clock Eastern this evening, we got on the phone, and only the minority party showed," Clune said. "So, feels like there's a lot of game-playing that's going on right now by the majority party."

Uh, well, that’s not exactly true. Shocker—something on CNN isn’t true. The Wall Street Journal’s Kimberley Strassel obtained emails between Republicans, Democrats, and Ramirez’s legal team. It clearly shows the GOP going to great lengths to collect information. She wants to be interviewed by the FBI, while the majority pervasively asks if there’s any further information she can give to the committee. A call was obviously going to happen, but they wanted to know if she had any further evidence other than the Mayer-Farrow New Yorkerpiece. The Democrats step in, apologize for how Republicans have been acting (how dare they ask if she has, you know, evidence), offer to get Ramirez in contact with the FBI; they blitzed the GOP’s attempt to do their job in verifying these serious allegations, despite the numerous plot holes. On GOP’s sixth time asking for more information before going forward with a call, Clune goes on CNN to trash Republicans for giving them the runaround.  

Advertisement

“This is a serious accusation. No law enforcement would commence investigation without such statement--this is basic request, in line with any committee probe. Yet every polite request for basic on record statement is ignored, rebuffed, delayed, denied. GOP has bent backwards,” Strassel wrote on Twitter. Someone’s lying. Gee—how apropos, given this nonsense:

Advertisement
Advertisement

And alas, that’s the playbook right there: ignore, rebuff, delay, and deny. The Democrats want to run out the clock. The GOP better not cave on the votes for this nomination which are set to go into motion this Friday. 

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement