Oh, So That's Why DOJ Isn't Going After Pro-Terrorism Agitators
The UN Endorses a Second Terrorist State for Iran
Jihad Joe
Biden Administration: 'Reasonable to Assess' That Israel Broke International Law With Gaza...
Israeli Ambassador Shreds the U.N. Charter in Powerful Speech Before Vote to Grant...
New Single Article of Impeachment Filed Against Biden
New Report Details How Dems Are Planning to Minimize Risk of Pro-Hamas Disruptions...
The Long Haul of Love
3,000 Fulton County Ballots Were Scanned Twice During the 2020 Election Recount
Joe Biden's Weapons 'Pause' Will Get More Israeli Soldiers, Civilians Killed
Left-Wing Mayor Hires Drag Queen to Spearhead 'Transgender Initiatives'
NewsNation Border Patrol Ride Along Sees Arrest of Illegal Immigrants in Illustration of...
One State Just Cut Off Funding for Planned Parenthood
Vulnerable Democratic Senators Refuse to Support Commonsense Pro-Life Bill
California Surf Competition Will Be Required to Allow Men to Compete Against Women
Tipsheet

MI GOV: Mark Schauer Just Could Not Get The Votes

While Michigan gubernatorial candidate Mark Schauer traveled to every part of the state ahead of Election Day last week, the Democratic base simply did not show up for him. Incumbent Republican Gov. Rick Snyder beat Schauer 51/47.

Advertisement

While turnout was projected to be higher than expected, it actually dropped 2.5 percent from 2010. With these numbers, Schauer’s only saving grace was to reach out to independent voters, who liked Snyder–and who enjoyed greater party base support this time around. Also, while Michigan U.S. Senate candidate Rep. Gary Peters was able to show a very human side to his campaign, which was a stark difference compared to that of his Republican rival, Terri Lynn Land; there wasn’t much of that with Schauer according to political analysts (via AP):

Three in 10 Michigan voters identified themselves as independents or members of other parties and, of those, Snyder prevailed by an almost 2-to-1 margin, according to the results of an exit poll conducted for The Associated Press and television networks.

Of the four in 10 who called themselves Democrats, 89 percent went for Schauer and 10 percent with Snyder. Three in 10 said they were Republicans — 94 percent voted for the governor, 6 percent for Schauer.

Ed Sarpolus, a political analyst and pollster, said voters also connected with Peters. He ran a TV ad, “Frugal,” in which his wife and daughters poked fun at their old washing machine and his frayed sweatshirt and ragged shoes. Other ads focused on his military service and Michigan roots.

“How much did you learn about Mark Schauer the man and his family? Nothing. ... There was no humanization of Mark Schauer. It was always attacks,” said Sarpolus, who conducted his own exit polling that found Schauer was largely an unknown quantity compared with the governor.

He said Schauer’s decision to flog Snyder on two major issues — taxing retirement income and cutting education funding — was an effort to persuade 2010 Snyder supporters to switch their vote.

“But he didn’t have issues to drive Democrats,” Sarpolus said, contending that while Peters had a broader agenda for moderates and women, the governor’s election ultimately determines overall voter numbers.

Advertisement

According to the exits, Snyder won:

  1. High school graduates 51/48
  2. College graduates 57/42
  3. $50k-$100k (the middle class) 52/47
  4. $100k-$200k 55/43
  5. Over $200k 61/37
  6. Suburbs 55/42
  7. Rural 50/49

Schauer won the urban areas 66/32 over Snyder, along with 18-29 year-olds, 30-44 year-olds, and households with union members.

As for the middle class vote, both sides can split it to compliment their narrative. Snyder won Michigan voters $50k-100k, but if you add all Michigan residents making less than $100k (Schauer dominated the under $50k demographic); Schauer beats Snyder slightly by a 51/48 margin. Still, it undercuts the Democratic Party mantra that they’re the party of the middle class– and Schauer’s attacks on Snyder, where he alleged that the governor was presiding over an economic recovery that only benefited the wealthy in Michigan.

Michigan voters who thought the economy was the most important issue facing the country–47 percent of them did–they broke for Snyder 51/48, while those who said they were “very worried” about their economic conditions overwhelmingly voted for Snyder 64/32. If you add the worried and not worried crosstabs together, 76 percent were worried about the state of the economy, while 24 percent were not; unsurprisingly the worried bloc broke for Snyder 55/42.

Snyder also won the votes of Michigan residents who work full-time [49/48] and part-time [50/48].

Lastly while there was a gender gap–Schauer won women 53/45–Snyder kept that deficit within single digits, keeping him competitive with that very powerful, but movable, bloc of voters.

Advertisement

Labor unions also invested heavily to beat the pro-right-to-work Snyder, but to no avail. Unions also tried to knock off Gov. Scott Walker in the neighboring Wisconsin; Walker won. It could be time for Michigan Democrats to find new allies in order to win elections–and recognize that labor unions’ political muscle has atrophied.

As Snyder enters a new term, the State Senate just passed a bill to improve Michigan’s infrastructure by enacting more gas taxes. Snyder said he’s open to having a gas tax pass, but also offering a sales tax hike so that voters can decide. Infrastructure was an issue that both Schauer and Snyder said needs attention.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement