This City Councilman Turned a $50K Deal Into a Personal Payday. Now He's...
Meet the Conservative Outsider Who Wants to Bring Common Sense Back to His...
How This Small-Town Police Force Became a 'Criminal Organization'
Iranian Regime's Latest Move Shows How Desperate It Has Become
CBS News Tried to Recalibrate Detention Stats — DHS Was Having None of...
If 'The Only Thing More Powerful Than Hate Is Love' Democrats Missed the...
Elites Did Their Part to Fight Global Warming by Flying Dozens of Private...
Historic: U.S. Marks Ninth Month With Zero Releases at the Border
Man Who Pushed Propaganda About a Young Gazan Boy Slaughtered By The IDF...
Harry Sisson Refuses to House Illegals in His Home, And Claims ICE Agent...
Critics Blast Katie Porter's Pre Super Bowl X Post As She Tries to...
Immigration Win: Federal Court Sides With Trump Admin on TPS Terminations for Multiple...
Federal Judge Blocks California Effort to Demask ICE Agents
Jasmine Crockett Might Be Running the Most Incompetent Campaign in History
WaPo Claims That Bad Bunny's Profane Performance Represented 'Wholesome Family Values'
Tipsheet

WH Wants Billions Back From California Over Bullet Train

(AP Photo/Rich Pedroncelli)

The Trump administration said they are exploring “every legal option” to get back $2.5 billion in federal funds California spent on its high-speed rail boondoggle, which Gov. Gavin Newsom announced in his first State of the State speech he is scaling back because it “would cost too much and take too long.” Additionally, the U.S. Department of Transportation said it plans to cancel $928 million in federal grants awarded to the project, which would’ve connected Los Angeles and San Francisco.  

Advertisement

Department of Transportation and Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) Administrator Ronald Batory said in his letter making the announcement that Newsom's comments were a "significant retreat from the State's initial vision and commitment and frustrates the purpose for which federal funding was awarded.”

He further said the state “materially failed to comply with the terms” of the agreement. 

The grant agreement between California and the federal government, signed in 2010, outlines several scenarios in which the federal government could take the money back. It can take the money back, for example, if the grantee fails to make "adequate progress" or "fails to complete the project or one of its tasks" or if the state doesn't meet its matching fund requirements.

If the federal government decides to take the money back, it doesn't have to wait for California to write a check. The agreement states the federal government could offset the money it would pay California for different transportation or other projects.

California hasn't yet fully matched the $2.5 billion in stimulus money. It's in the process of doing so now, using money from the 2008 bond passed by voters and revenue from the state's cap-and-trade program. It can't unlock the $929 million grant until it completes its match. (CNBC)

Advertisement

Related:

CALIFORNIA

Newsom vowed to fight to keep the money and said the move was nothing but political retribution after the state sued the administration over the president’s declaration of a national emergency to pay for the border wall. 

"This is clear political retribution by President Trump, and we won't sit idly by," Newsom said in a statement. "This is California's money, and we are going to fight for it."

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement