This Is How Mike Johnson Will Stop Lawmakers From Challenging Trump's Tariffs
Immigration Judge Blocks DHS Effort to Deport Student for Criticizing Israel
US Attorney Asks Judge to Dismiss Indictment Against Steve Bannon
Jasmine Crockett Shows Just How Low Democrats Are Willing to Go to Attack...
Wisconsin High School Is Hosting a Drag Show. Guess Who's Participating.
You Are the Carbon They Want to Reduce: WEF 'Sustainability' Leftist Wants to...
FBI Releases Images of Suspect in Nancy Guthrie Kidnapping
Scott Jennings: Democrats Are Losing the Voter ID Argument
Guess Why This Kentucky Judge Gave an Unrepentant Criminal a Lighter Sentence
A Boy Has Stolen Another Girls' Championship Title
Dozens of Detransitioners Have Filed Lawsuits, and the Costs Could End 'Gender-Affirming C...
Latest Leftist Stupid: Trump Abolished Second Amendment
Dow 50,000: A Supply-Side Miracle
Even Jimmy Kimmel Is Calling Out Democrats for Being Sudden Bad Bunny Fans
Welcome to California: Inside CA's Homelessness Crisis With Nick Shirley
Tipsheet

Irish Magazine Defends Decision to Publish Cover With Bullseye on Trump's Head

Irish magazine Village is defending the provocative cover of its February issue that pictures President Trump with a bullseye on his head. Worse yet, the image was accompanied by the words “why not” in big, bold letters.

Advertisement

.@lukemcmanus @SiobhanDowling.. @VillageMagIRE are just as edgy. if that is the right word. which it isn't. pic.twitter.com/UCHO07Sjfc

— Luke Clancy (@lukeclancy) February 7, 2017

But the magazine said Tuesday that it’s not encouraging violence of any sort toward the president. Their reasoning? Because there is no question mark after “why not.”

It reads 'WHY NOT'. Then it links to the editorial which duly EXPLAINS WHY NOT https://t.co/YC7rP1GXeL ? would signal equivocation or worse https://t.co/2UJjFU8VDx

— Village Magazine (@VillageMagIRE) February 7, 2017

While the article discussed the act of killing a tyrant, which it wrote “has had support from various philosophers and theologians through the centuries,” they noted that doing so in Trump’s case was “unnecessary and disproportionate.”  

“Trump is a fool, he will alienate friends and enrage enemies. He will breach the constitution, illegally enrich himself, fall out with his allies and make evidence-unsupported mistakes,” the article reads before making the moral case for not assassinating the 45th president of the United States.

Advertisement

Related:

DONALD TRUMP

Their reasoning is that the American public will then be made aware (during his inevitable impeachment or resignation) of the “dangers of allowing power to an intolerant narcissist.” This awareness, the authors state, will bring about change: “institutions will be reformed, progressive policies enshrined and popular opinion inured against ever repeating the Trump mistake.”

“The calculus is clearly against violence, even in the case of Trump,” the Village concludes. “Stick to democracy, rigorously but applied, as necessary, stealthily and aggressively.”

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement