'This Is Where the Systematic Killing Took Place': 200 Days of War From...
NYPD Arrests Dozens Who Besieged Area Near Chuck Schumer's Home
White House Insists Biden Has Been 'Very Clear' About His Position on Pro-Hamas...
Watch Biden Lose the Battle With His Teleprompter Again
NYT Claims Trump Is Getting 'Favorable Treatment' from the NYPD
Texas Doesn't Take Passive Approach to Anti-Israel Mobs
Columbia Prof Who Called to Defund the Police, Now Wants Police to Protect...
Pelosi's Daughter Criticizes J6 Judges Who are 'Out for Blood' After Handing Down...
Mike Johnson Addresses Anti-Israel Hate As Hundreds Harass the School’s Jewish Community
DeSantis May Not Be Facing Biden in November, but Still Offers Perfect Response...
Lawmakers in One State Pass Legislation to Allow Teachers to Carry Guns in...
UnitedHealth Has Too Much Power
Former Democratic Rep. Who Lost to John Fetterman Sure Doesn't Like the Senator...
Biden Rewrote Title IX to Protect 'Trans' People. Here's How Somes States Responded.
Watch: Joe Biden's Latest Flub Is Laugh-Out-Loud Funny
Tipsheet

Trump, Navy Plan Largest Fleet Expansion in Decades

In the face of threats from China and Russia, and responding to President-elect Trump’s pledge to build a 350 ship fleet, the Navy is proposing the biggest shipbuilding increase since the Cold War.

Advertisement

Last month the Navy proposed 355 new ships, but that could come with a hefty price tag: an additional $5 billion to $5.5 billion in yearly spending in the Navy’s 30-year projection, according to an estimate by the Congressional Research Service.

The Navy's revised Force Structure Assessment calls for adding another 47 ships including an aircraft carrier built in Virginia, 16 large surface warships built in Maine and Mississippi, and 18 attack submarines built in Connecticut, Rhode Island and Virginia. It also calls for more amphibious assault ships, expeditionary transfer docks and support ships.

In addition to being good for national security, a larger fleet would be better for both the sailors, who'd enjoy shorter deployments, and for the ships, which would have more down time for maintenance, said Matthew Paxton, president of the Shipbuilders Council of America, which represents most of the major Navy shipbuilders.

Advertisement

"Russia and China are going to continue to build up their navies," Paxton told the AP. "The complexities aren't going to get any easier. The Navy, more than any of the services, is our forward presence. We're going to need this Navy."

The cost of doing so cannot be ignored, however. 

"Whether Congress and the government can actually fund it, is a whole other ball game," Rich Nolan, president of the shipyard's largest union, told the AP. 

"A lot of people are hopeful that it'll happen," he said. "But they're taking a wait-and-see approach. They've heard it before and then seen it not come to fruition."

Currently, the Navy has 274 deployable battle force ships.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement