Oh, So That's Why DOJ Isn't Going After Pro-Terrorism Agitators
The UN Endorses a Second Terrorist State for Iran
Biden Administration Hurls Israel Under the Bus Again
Israeli Ambassador Shreds the U.N. Charter in Powerful Speech Before Vote to Grant...
New Single Article of Impeachment Filed Against Biden
New Report Details How Dems Are Planning to Minimize Risk of Pro-Hamas Disruptions...
The Long Haul of Love
Trump Addresses the Very Real Chance of Him Going to Jail
Yes, Jen Psaki Really Said This About Biden Cutting Off Weapons Supply to...
3,000 Fulton County Ballots Were Scanned Twice During the 2020 Election Recount
Joe Biden's Weapons 'Pause' Will Get More Israeli Soldiers, Civilians Killed
Left-Wing Mayor Hires Drag Queen to Spearhead 'Transgender Initiatives'
NewsNation Border Patrol Ride Along Sees Arrest of Illegal Immigrants in Illustration of...
One State Just Cut Off Funding for Planned Parenthood
Vulnerable Democratic Senators Refuse to Support Commonsense Pro-Life Bill
Tipsheet

Congressmen to Introduce Bill to Help Bring Charlie Gard to the U.S.

Rep. Trent Franks (R-AZ) and Rep. Brad Wenstrup (R-OH) announced Friday that they will be introducing legislation this week to help 11-month-old Charlie Gard who suffers from a rare genetic condition, mitochondrial depletion syndrome. The congressmen want to make the critically ill baby a lawful permanent resident so that he can come from the UK for experimental treatment.

Advertisement

"Despite Charlie’s heartbreaking condition, his parents have refused to give up hope,” the congressmen write. “They have advocated for him fiercely. They have raised over £1 million to pay for their son to receive experimental treatment in the United States. They have kept fighting for his life.”

“Our bill will support Charlie's parents' right to choose what is best for their son, by making Charlie a lawful permanent resident in the U.S. in order for him to receive treatments that could save his life,” they explain.

The Great Ormond Street Hospital in the UK, where Charlie is receiving life support, planned to remove his life support against the wishes of his parents, who had raised money to take him to the United States for an experimental treatment. The European Court of Human Rights sided with the hospital, ruling that it would not be in his best interest to go to the United States and receive the treatment.

After an international public outcry against the decision that included Pope Francis, President Trump, and Cher, the hospital is keeping Charlie on life support and filing for another hearing in light of new evidence regarding experimental treatment options.

Advertisement

The parents attended that highly anticipated hearing Monday to plead their case. The judge gave them 48 hours to present new evidence of how the experimental treatment will benefit their son.

“Should this little boy to be ordered to die -- because a third party, overriding the wishes of his parents, believes it can conclusively determine that immediate death is what is best for him?” The congressmen asked in their statement.

“Every human life has dignity, including the lives of those who cannot speak up for themselves,” they conclude. “When government is able to overrule a parent or guardian in determining a patient’s best interest, every vulnerable patient is put at risk. We offer Connie Yates and Chris Gard our heartfelt support as they seek to care for their son.”

Charlie’s mother Connie Yates spoke out Sunday while delivering a petition with more than 350,00 signatures asking the hospital to let Charlie go to the U.S. for treatment.

"He's our son, he's our flesh and blood and we feel that it should be our right as parents to decide to give him a chance at life," Yates said. "For a medication that is just an oral medicine, no known major side effects, you know, there is nothing to lose. He deserves a chance."

Advertisement

Charlie's father, Chris, emphasized that there is no evidence Charlie has "catastrophic brain damage," saying, "He should have had this chance a long time ago. They said it wasn't fair to leave him on a ventilator for three months with a treatment that they didn't think was going to work, he's now been left for seven months with no treatment, so he could have had it twice over. He deserves this chance at last and hopefully we will get it."

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement