Biden Censorship Official Can't Answer Basic Questions About the First Amendment
KJP Cornered on Biden’s Terrorism Appeasement Narrative
The Perfect Symbol to Describe the Pro-Hamas Crowd Was Discovered at USC
One Moment Amid Campus Chaos at UNC Chapel Hill Will Give You Hope...
The List of 'Needs' that Entitled Pro-Hamas Students Are Demanding Include 'Vegan Food,...
Florida's Six-Week Abortion Ban Takes Effect
Vulnerable Democratic Incumbent Sherrod Brown Flip-Flops on Pro-Hamas Protests
Here's How Trump Is Performing in These Battleground States
Video Shows Moment ‘Trans’ Sex Offender Tries to Snatch Child From School Grounds
Trump Campaign Wanted Earlier Debates, but Commission Is Sticking to Original Schedule
One State Will Require Students to Watch Pro-Life Prenatal Development Videos in Schools
Fani Willis Challenger Debates Empty Podium After DA Skips Face-Off
Washington’s Troops, Today’s Protesters
NY Squad Members Hardest Hit by NYPD's Involvement in Quelling Columbia's Pro-Hamas Protes...
Trump Just Got More Good Polling News, but What About Key Senate Races?
Tipsheet

Spicer Asks Press Corps Why They're Arguing Over Dates, Not Substance in Investigations

White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer engaged in (another) back and forth with CNN’s Jim Acosta on Friday over the investigation into reports that the Trump transition team had been placed under surveillance by Obama intelligence officials. Acosta pressed Spicer about what appears to be a shifting narrative in terms of Trump’s Twitter accusations. Why, he wondered, don't his initial accusations about wiretapping mesh with the White House's current arguments? Spicer berated him for zooming in on dates, when he should be focused on the substance.

Advertisement

“We’re arguing over the date, not the substance,” Spicer said, frustratedly.

What the press should be asking, Spicer said, is why the intelligence community was using resources to surveil Trump’s team, to unmask U.S. officials, and to spread classified information.

If we’re asking why pertinent revelations happened “on a Monday or a Tuesday,” we’ve lost focus, he said.

“It is fascinating to me that we are now arguing over the date, not the substance,” he continued. “American citizens potentially were surveilled. This is happening in this country. There is a concern people misused classified information and violated civil liberties. That should concern every single American.”

“The details matter,” Acosta insisted, before asking Spicer if he now has evidence that Trump was the target of surveillance.

The press secretary said not exactly, but the materials that he's seen will be provided to the House and Senate Intel committees looking into the matter and it will convince them "they should further their investigation."

Spicer also remarked on the investigation into Trump’s potential ties to Russian officials.

“There’s been no evidence” of those ties, Spicer said, pivoting to Hillary Clinton.

Advertisement

Clinton “failed to reset policy” with Russia when she was secretary of state, he said. Additionally, she personally called Vladimir Putin and the Obama administration sold uranium to Russia

“If you want to talk about a Russian connection, look to Hillary,” he said. “It is night and day.”

When asked about reports that former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn has offered to testify on the Russia investigation in exchange for immunity, Spicer said the president believes he should go testify.

The press secretary also denied that Flynn had incriminating information to share about the White House in his potential testimony.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement