Joe Scarborough Really Stretched the Limits of Sanity With This Take on the...
Fiasco: NYC GOP Councilwoman Just Obliterated Mamdani Over the City's Shambolic Winter Sto...
CBS News Peddled Fake News About Bad Bunny and ICE Post-Super Bowl Performance
Yes, This Was the Best Response to John Kasich's Tweet About the Super...
A Bar Patron Had a Total Meltdown During the Super Bowl. The Reason...
Maybe We Should Be Glad Bad Bunny Performed in Spanish
Notice Where This Ex-ESPN Reporter's Attempt to Mock Conservatives Over Bad Bunny Laughabl...
Why Are Americans Fleeing Blue States for Red States?
Deadline Tries to Guilt Trip John Lithgow for Starring in HBO's 'Harry Potter'...
Mayor Mamdani Becomes First NYC Leader to Skip Archbishop Installation in Almost a...
Is There Any Good News Out There?
When Canadians Were Actually Funny
The Student ICE Walkouts Are a Troubling Reminder of How Revolutionaries Are Made
America’s Security Doesn’t End at the Ice’s Edge
Talks About Talks: How Tehran Is Buying Time While Washington Hesitates
Tipsheet

Did The Supreme Court Pick Just Leak On Twitter?

UPDATE: Uh, maybe yes?

Neil Gorsuch was in fact nominated to the Supreme Court, and the account is now unlocked. However, this doesn't mean it's his actual account.

Advertisement

Stay tuned?

---Original Post---

As we all know, President Donald Trump will be making his pick for the Supreme Court tonight at 8 p.m. Eastern. However, due to an awkward Twitter mishap, the pick may have already leaked: Justice Neil Gorsuch.

A protected, private account with the handle @JusticeNGorsuch with the bio "Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States" appeared shortly before 1 p.m. on Tuesday. As Gorsuch's account is locked, it is impossible to see who are the 22 people following the account and the seven people that the account follows. The account also has two unknown tweets.

While it's entirely possible that this is a parody or joke account, there does not appear to be a similar account for the other reported "finalist" for the spot, Justice Thomas Hardiman. Hardiman's relatively empty Twitter handle does not mention the Supreme Court.

It's entirely possible that the person who created the account assumed that protected accounts could not be seen nor would be visible in search. Clearly, this isn't correct.

We'll know in about seven hours if this "leak" turns out to be correct.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos