It’s Their Own Fault We No Longer Default to Respect
Did This Issue Catapult Japanese Conservatives to a Landslide Win in Their Elections?
US Women's Hockey Team Clubbed the Canadians Like Baby Seals Yesterday. Oh, and...
Lisa Murkowski Just Stabbed Her Party in the Back on the SAVE Act
Why This Girl Wrestler Had Shock and Horror All Over Her Face? It's...
Bill Maher Reveals Why He Got the COVID Vaccine...and He's Rather Annoyed About...
Iran Is Preparing for a US Airstrike – Here's What Trump Is Saying
Man's Best Friend: Mystery Dog Helps Louisville Police Find Missing Toddler
Sen. Alex Padilla Gets Dragged for Sharing a Letter From Detained Migrant Child
The January Jobs Report Is Here
TX State Rep. Harrison Calls for Gene Wu to Be Stripped of Committee...
Check Out This Ridiculous Axios Headline About Plummeting Crime Rates
Police Released Person of Interest Detained in Guthrie Disappearance. Here's What We Know.
Report: The FAA Closed El Paso Airspace After Mexican Cartel Drone Incursion; Airspace...
Steve Hilton Promises a ‘Political Revolution’ in California, And He’s Leading the Polls
Tipsheet

Shaun King Fumes that South Carolina Democrats Co-Sponsored Bill to Ban Baggy Pants

Author and civil rights activist Shaun King thinks a group of South Carolina Democrats have their priorities backwards after introducing a bill that would dole out punishments to individuals for wearing baggy pants.

Advertisement

House Bill 4957 would make it illegal for a person to expose their skin or underwear by wearing their pants "three inches below the crest of his ileum" —the top of the hips.

Violation fines equal just enough to buy that much needed belt: $25 for a first offense; $50 or three hours of community service for a second offense; and $75 or six hours of community service for a third or subsequent offense. (WLTX19)

Why are these politicians worried more about appearances than gun violence? he wondered.

He became angrier when he realized some of the bill's primary co-sponsors are Democrats.

Advertisement

Related:

SOUTH CAROLINA

The ACLU of Virginia has been retweeting social media users who claim the bill will give police an excuse to let police stop and harass black men. It is "racist, dangerous, and unconstitutional" some argue.

A representative from the ACLU of South Carolina, meanwhile, claims that the lawmakers are trying to divert attention from the more pressing issue of gerrymandering.

"This bill is a waste of taxpayers’ money and an attempt to sustain debtor’s prisons in South Carolina," ACLU of South Carolina Executive Director Shaundra Young Scott told the New York Daily News.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement