Don't Play Their Game
House Republicans Want to Know Why Ilhan Omar's Income Jumped by 140 Percent...
UN Report Says One of the Deadliest Threats to US National Security Is...
Here's What Trump Had to Say About That Olympic Athlete Who Bashed His...
Elites Did Their Part to Fight Global Warming by Flying Dozens of Private...
Historic: U.S. Marks Ninth Month With Zero Releases at the Border
'Brass-Knuckled Hypocrisy:' Even the Washington Post Is Slamming Virginia Democrats' Redis...
This Viral Super Bowl Halftime Story About Bad Bunny's Grammy Was Completely False
John Kasich Called Bad Bunny's Show a Celebration of Latino Culture. Did He...
Senator Eric Schmitt Goes Nuclear on Dems Over ICE Funding, Immigration, and the...
Check Out How the Media Portrayed Japan's Conservative Party's Big Election Win
Here Is the Real Reason Bad Bunny Is Anti-American
We Didn't Think Progressives Could Make LA Any Worse, but They Can
Don Lemon Defends Bad Bunny's Halftime Show While Admitting He Had No Idea...
'The President’s Plan Is Working,' Scott Bessent Predicts a Booming Economy in 2026
OPINION

Sanders Drops in on Trump’s Populist Wave

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.

By: Tim Maverick.

The American public is feeling ornery.

Once again, the elite political class wants to give voters a choice between a Clinton and a Bush. But this time around, people are looking for someone different.

Advertisement

Two populist candidates have been hoisted up by the public in both the Republican and Democrat fields. Each crying out for more change than the frontrunners.

Those two candidates’ ideals couldn’t be further apart. But Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders are working the same strategy.

The Same Coin

To me, Sanders and Trump are simply two sides of the same populist coin.

The Republican elite keeps predicting Trump’s demise after each insensitive statement. Yet he continues to remain popular, riding issues such as immigration and fearlessly talking about politically incorrect subjects.

The Democrat elite are agape as Sanders, the self-declared “democratic socialist,” continues outdrawing Hillary Clinton at rallies while he points the finger at Wall Street and other “villains” for pulling our country down.

In fact, Sanders is drawing crowds of 20,000 to 30,000 people around the country. Some pundits even compare Sanders’ rallies to the early days of the Obama grassroots campaign.

Meanwhile, Clinton tops out at about 5,000. Most attendees are probably just trying to stay awake, as are those at Bush rallies.

As Philip Rucker ofThe Washington Postsaid about Trump and Sanders' popularity, “The surging candidacies… are fueled by people's anger with the status quo and desire for authenticity in political leaders.”

With both Sanders and Trump, you get plain talkers who don't care much about political correctness. Traits that Americans seem desperate for.

Advertisement

A Populist Surge

The force behind the populist wave is, of course, the same engine that powers every aspect of our country – the economy.

This economic recovery, if you can even call it that, is the worst on record since World War II.

The perception is that the recession was caused by the Wall Street elite, who were then bailed out and have enjoyed years of prosperity since.

But Main Street feels left behind – unemployed, underemployed, and struggling to make ends meet. That inflames both the left and the right - Occupy Wall Street and the Tea Party both want to be financially secure.

Thus, many feel the political class has completely failed them.

Populism is nothing new in the United States. Back in the 19th century, Mary Elizabeth Lease’s Populist Party campaign harped on the slogan “Wall Street owns the country.” She railed against the business elite making average Americans “wage slaves.”

Sanders' campaign reminds me of Ecclesiastes 1:9 – “There is nothing new under the sun.”

The Key Question

So, will the populist streak in the American electorate continue or will it fade as it always has?

Historically, the off-the-radar candidates do lose steam as the election draws nearer. In 2004, Howard Dean seemed to be the man for the Democrats. But John Kerry ended up as the candidate. In 2012, Republicans first liked Michele Bachmann, then Herman Cain, and then even Newt Gingrich. But the candidate ended up being Mitt Romney.

Advertisement

Perhaps the populist candidates succumb to the constant push of the well-funded political elite and their allies in the media. Or it could be that the American people decide it’s better to go with the devil they know.

I would love to see Trump and Sanders face off in the election. (What theatre it would be!)

But we will probably end up with Clinton versus Bush, or some other so-called “safe” Republican candidate.

Tim Maverick boasts decades of experience in the investment world. He spent 20 years at a major brokerage firm as a trading supervisor and broker working directly with clients. He also wrote the daily market update for the firm’s Mid-Atlantic Region. Tim has been writing for financial publications for the past 10 years. Before joining Wall Street Daily, he wrote for Tim Seymour's (CNBC) Emerging Money, Tom Lydon's ETF Trends, Commodity HQ, Money Morning, Investment U, and Wyatt Investment Research. With Tim's experience working with retail investors, he's particularly adept at helping everyday investors understand the financial markets. Follow Tim on twitter@TimMaverickWSD.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement