Jamie Raskin's Low Opinion of Women
Thank You, GOD!
Trump Slams Bad Bunny's Horrendous Halftime Show
Federal Judge Sentences Abilene Drug Trafficker to Life for Fentanyl Distribution
The Turning Point Halftime Show Crushed Expectations
Jeffries Calls Citizenship Proof ‘Voter Suppression’ as Majority of Americans Back Voter I...
Four Reasons Why the Washington Post Is Dying
Foreign-Born Ohio Lawmaker Pushes 'Sensitive Locations' Bill to Limit ICE Enforcement
TrumpRx Triggers TDS in Elizabeth Warren
Texas Democrat Goes Viral After Pitting Whites Against Minorities
U.S. Secret Service Seized 3 Card Skimmers in Alabama, Stopping $3.1M in Fraud
Jasmine Crockett Finally Added Some Policy to Her Website and It Was a...
No Sanctuary in the Sanctuary
Chromosomes Matter — and Women’s Sports Prove It
The Economy Will Decide Congress — If Republicans Actually Talk About It
OPINION

The logic of running a foreign-policy campaign in 2012

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.

If you watched Monday’s GOP debate, you saw that the Republican presidential hopefuls are pretty sure they know what this election is going to be about: the deficit. The size of government. Jobs. But what if they’re wrong?

Advertisement

In 2000, it was pretty clear that the next administration would mainly be caretakers of our peace and prosperity and managers of our surplus. Then came 9/11, and we realized, in retrospect, that the 2000 election was perhaps the most consequential in memory. The 2008 election was supposed to be about Iraq, but late in the game, the financial sector cracked open. We barely hear about our two wars these days. Who’s to say the 2012 candidates have any firmer grasp on what the issue will be next year, or in the second year of their hoped-for terms?

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement