It Looks Like Chris Murphy Fell for Iranian Propaganda After Cheering on Tehran...
Why the Latest Talks With Iran Got Stalled
Leftist Group That Falsely Branded Conservatives as 'Extremists' Could Face Criminal Charg...
Corrupt Democrat Announces Resignation Hours After Saying She Won't Step Down
Democratic Lawmaker Refuses to Resign After Facing Indictment for Stealing FEMA Cash
You're Gonna Laugh When You Find Out What Tim Walz Is Up to...
Iranian Supreme Leader Sidelined As Military Takes More Control
ICE Confirms an Illegal Immigrant From Venezuela Bludgeoned a Co-Worker to Death in...
The U.S. Is Still Blowing Up Narco Terrorist Vessels in the Caribbean
Illegal Immigrant Who Assaulted Nine High School Girls in VA Learns His Fate...
Check Out Cory Booker's Unhinged Speech at the Michigan Democratic Women's Caucus
President Trump Rips Into 'Paper Tiger' NATO While Lauding Allied Gulf States
Secretary Markwayne Mullin Warns Emergency Funding for DHS Is Set to Run Out...
President Trump Lays Into the Supreme Court Over Their Tariff Ruling
General Keane Says We Are Watching the Disarray of Iranian Leadership Play Out...
OPINION

Big Citi Hack Reveals Ugly Truth About Banks

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
Big Citi Hack Reveals Ugly Truth About Banks
(Newser) – The massive data breach at Citigroup has alarmed customers, angered lawmakers, and sparked debate on whether big banks are spending enough money on protecting their customers' information, the New York Times finds. Credit card companies have devoted their resources to preventing fraud from occurring when data is stolen and not invested enough in preventing data breaches from occurring in the first place, analysts say. While banks have gotten better at curtailing fraud—today, it costs banks 5 cents of every $100 changed, down from 15 cents in 1992—some say banks have little reason to try to shrink that even more.
Advertisement

That's because fraud can actually be a source of income, thanks to charge-back fees for fraudulent purchases, and the fact that it's the retailer who often assumes the cost of improperly bought items. And so the embedded-chip system used in much of Europe and Asia has not been adopted by US firms, who argue that retailers don't want to invest heavily in upgrading their card readers. Technology to encrypt data as it flows across the payment system has also been shunned by most firms. "Unfortunately, some companies look at breaches as the cost of doing business,” says the chief information of Heartland Payment Systems, which overhauled its systems after a massive breach in 2008. “That’s not the right way to look at it. You need to be as secure as you possibly can be."

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement