Get this: The federal government is trying to explain things to citizens in plain English.
In 2010, you see, President Obama signed the Plain Writing Act into law. It requires that all federal agencies use "clear government communication that the public can understand and use."
In 2011, Obama took the plain-language initiative a step further. He issued an executive order (No. 13563) that demands that government "regulations are accessible, consistent, written in plain language, and easy to understand."
Too bad these actions came after ObamaCare, which Nancy Pelosi said Congress had to pass so we could find out what was in it.
Of course, bills written by lobbyists, who are paying off members of Congress to make laws that enrich them, are poorly written on purpose. Don't ask me - ask ObamaCare consultant Jonathan Gruber.
"This bill was written in a tortured way to make sure (the Congressional Budget Office) did not score the mandate as taxes," said Gruber. "If CBO scored the mandate as taxes, the bill dies. ... Lack of transparency is a huge political advantage. And basically, you know, call it the stupidity of the American voter or whatever, but basically that was really, really critical to get the thing to pass."
Besides, politicians don't write the actual rules and regulations. All they do is write and pass the bill. Then it is then sent to government regulators, who review the bill and, based on their interpretation of it, write the rules and regulations.
These are the most powerful people in Washington, D.C. They work in more than 50 different regulatory agencies and each is empowered to create and enforce rules and regulations that are backed by the might of federal law. Individuals and organizations can be fined or thrown in jail for violating them.
Being somewhat fearful of being fined or thrown in jail, I prefer that we have fewer rules, not more of them. Consider the complex rules and regulations that pertain to the IRS. The IRS itself doesn't understand half of them. Call two different agents with a tax question and you'll likely get two different answers!
Regrettably, rules and regulations are growing at a rapid clip. According to The Heritage Foundation, the number of major federal regulations issued by the Obama administration in its first five years was 153.2 percent higher than the number issued by the George W. Bush administration during its first five years.
The Heritage Foundation says a major federal regulation is defined as "any rule that the Administrator of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs of the Office of Management and Budget finds has resulted in or is likely to result in: (A) an annual effect on the economy of $100,000,000 or more; (B) a major increase in costs or prices for consumers, individual industries, Federal, State, or local government agencies, or geographic regions; or (C) significant adverse effects on competition, employment, investment, productivity, innovation, or on the ability of the United States-based enterprises to compete with foreign-based enterprises in domestic and export markets."
Or, to put it in plain English, a major rule is a pain in the patootie! And Obama issued 157 major rules in the first five years of his presidency, compared to 62 major rules added during Bush's first five years.
Today, the Federal Register runs to nearly 80,000 pages a year - quite an increase since 1935, when it was about 2,000 pages.
I'm grateful that our government is trying write rules and regulations in plain English, so that we citizens can read and understand them and stay out of the clink.
But let me be clear: I'd rather have fewer regulations that are poorly written than the zillions of clear ones we have now.