Biden Bolts to Canada With No Plans to Visit East Palestine, Ohio
It's Come to This: Dollar Tree Confirms Removing Eggs Due to Soaring Prices
Here's the New Asylum Policy the US and Canada Adopted
Adios: Cuban Player Defects During World Baseball Classic
Here's Why I Identify As a Black San Francisco Resident
Stanford College Republicans Names and Shames Students Who Intimidated School Dean
Mopping Up for Biden
Kamala Harris Forgets How to Speak Once Again
Trump Calls for Woke Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg to be Fired
Biden's Approval Rating Sinks to Lowest It Has Been Since Taking Office
Anti-Gun Protestors Arrested After Storming House Judiciary Hearing on Gun Control
World Athletics to Exclude Transgender Athletes From Women’s Events
Armed Russian Jets Flying Over U.S. Bases Prove Just How Weak of a...
ATF Torched Over New Rule That Turns Millions Into Felons
Transgender Athlete Wins NYC Women’s Cycling Event

The White-Hatted Remnant is Coming to Build Things Back

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of
Tuesday marks the mid-term elections. How will they turn out?

Big net gains for the good guys.

You define the Teapartiers and the Republicans as 'the good guys'?

Definitely. And the leftists, liberals, progressives -- Democrats all -- as the black-hats, or bad guys. Back in the Fifties, watching television westerns, my (older) sister would keep me up to date in the final chase scenes by saying -- based, I finally figured out, on the color of the hats the cowboys were wearing -- 'Those are the good guys. Those are the bad guys. Those are the....' She didn't know it, but she was introducing me to modern politics.

White hats, good guys -- conservatives. Got it. And they're going to win big?

Maybe on a scale of revolutionary magnitude. Predicting elections is like predicting judges -- a highly risky business. But the near-unanimity of the polls suggests this is going to be a wave election, crashing hard onto the liberal Democratic beaches and washing them clean.


Because of the Teapartiers. Formally around for only about 18 months, they may prove -- already have proved -- to be game-changers. They share vastly more with the Republicans than the Democrats. So, after the primaries, they, for the most part, allied with the Republicans rather than running third-party candidates of their own. In the process, they've generated unseen electricity into campaigns and have provided the Republicans with too-often-missing backbone.

But the Teapartiers are so -- you know -- extreme. And they're so focused on such divisive social issues: you know -- abortion, homosexuality, bias in the mainline churches and mainstream media.

On the contrary, the Teapartiers have demonstrated their prudence in two genius strokes: (1) not running their own third-party general-election candidates and (2) avoiding social/cultural issues. They speak almost exclusively of spending and taxes and governmental size. They talk of the Founding and constitutional principles. Thus the 'Tea Party' name. The original 'tea party,' when Bostonians dumped tea into their harbor, was all about taxes imposed by the British crown.

THAT WAS pretty extreme to the British.

Of course it was. Obedient British subjects were not supposed to behave that way, but to do what they were told by the British authorities. Today's Teapartiers, allied with Republicans, are tired of being told what to do by today's equivalent of the British crown -- the federal authorities. That's why those who have run things for so long in Washington are so stunned by the speed with which the Tea Party movement has caught on.

Still, it seems these people came out of nowhere -- out of the blue.

Wrong again. They've been there all along. They are the Remnant, the silent majority. People long without a voice -- largely shut out in the New York/Washington-centric media and the corridors of political and ideological power. People weary of unsupportable spending and unsustainable taxes -- and government growing ever bigger and ever more remote. People tired of tone-deaf politicians and staged press conferences and lies and denial and doubletalk and gobbledygook.

The Remnant?

Again, the silent majority -- as described by essayist Albert Jay Nock in his piece, "Isaiah's Job," from chapter 13 of his book "Free Speech and Plain Language" (1937).


In Nock's essay, the Lord tells prophet Isaiah, despondent that no one seems to be listening to him, to press on. A quiet cohort, he says, does notice and is listening. He explains to Isaiah: "There is a Remnant...that you know nothing about. They are obscure, unorganized, inarticulate....They need to be encouraged,...because when everything has gone completely to the dogs, they are the ones who will come back and build up a new society."

'Obscure, unorganized, inarticulate' --

But not any longer. They are today's Teapartiers -- Nock's Remnant given voice at last. They're tired of leftovers and crumbs scrounged under the federal banquet table, and they aren't going to take it anymore. In Tuesday's results we will see the consequences of their anger and frustration.

They're going to win?

Big. When you hear Tea Party, think revolution, because in America the two are linguistic cousins.

How big?

Revolutionary big. Before-and-after big. Big-wave, beach-cleansing big.

We'll see.

Indeed we will. On Tuesday, the white-hatted Remnant is coming to build things back. Mark it well.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member


Trending on Townhall Video