Men Are Going to Strike Back
Wait, That's Why Dems Are Scared About ICE Agents Wearing Body Cams
Bill Maher Had the Perfect Response to Billie Eilish's 'Stolen Land' Nonsense
Some Guy Wanted to Test Something at an Anti-ICE Rally. Their Reaction Says...
The Trump Team Quoted the Perfect TV Show to Defend a Proposed WH...
Why This Former CNN Reporter Saying He'd Fire Scott Jennings Is Amusing
Democrats Have Earned All the Bad Things
Don Lemon Plays Civil Rights Martyr After Cities Church Mob Arrest
Canadian PM Carney Just Announced a Plan to Make Canadian Inflation Worse
CA Governor Election 2026: Bianco or Hilton
Same Old, Same Old
The Real Purveyors of Jim Crow
Senior Voters Are Key for a GOP Victory in Midterms
The Deep State’s Inversion Matrix Must Be Seen to Be Defeated
Situational Science and Trans Medicine
OPINION

ACLU: Sight of Cross on Public Tree Inflicts ‘Irreparable Harm’

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.

Joseph Tompkins is an “irreparable harm” survivor. He’s the guy who got the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) to force a small Indiana town to remove a cross from atop its municipal Christmas tree on Monday.

Advertisement

Mr. Tompkins, who must be blessed with remarkably selective eyesight, was “forced to come into direct and unwelcome contact” with the cross on top of the tree in the public square as he drove through Knightstown, causing him “irreparable harm,” said the ACLU lawsuit filed on Dec. 8 on his behalf.

While Mr. Tompkins may have won his legal battle, he’s lost the culture war as other local residents have responded by displaying hundreds of crosses on everything from buildings to car antennas.

Now, instead of one cross on a stationary tree, an army of crosses is crisscrossing the city on public streets paid for with Mr. Tompkins’s very own tax dollars. Plus, the town Christmas tree is still there, awash with lights and ornaments. City officials can “Christianize” it with a star on top or an angel if they’re so inclined.

“I just thought we should rebel some way or let him know how we feel,” Knightstown resident Patricia Hutson told FOX59, explaining the outbreak of cross displays. Hutson herself made 200 wooden crosses and gave them out during a Sunday night vigil for the cross.

“I hope they make people realize that we should speak up for what we believe in and stand up for it and not be pushed around,” Hutson said.

Advertisement

In its lawsuit the ACLU had demanded immediate removal of the cross, monetary damages, legal fees and a ruling that the cross violated the First Amendment’s Establishment clause.

City officials in Knightstown, which has 2,100 residents and lies 40 miles east of Indianapolis, held out for a few days but relented on Monday, citing fear of exorbitant legal fees – the inevitable side-effect of the ACLU browbeating communities into surrendering their customs.

According to the ACLU, Mr. Tompkins said he “objects to any of his tax dollars going to pay for the erection or maintenance of the display or the lighting of it.”

Well, it looks like Mr. Tompkins and the ACLU picked on the wrong town this time. Let’s hope Knightstown’s response to the bullies gets noticed and emulated far and wide.

Robert Knight is a Senior Fellow for the American Civil Rights Union.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement