The GOP Is Changing, And That’s Good
Nikki Haley Keeps Making a Mess of Things
Don’t Get Too Excited About California’s Senate Race Just Yet
Climate Catastrophizing Finally Backfiring on Radical Environmentalists
Separation of Church and State
Will Nikki Haley Claim The Declaration of Independence, Constitution ‘Not the Same’ and...
GOP Leaders, Listen to Your Base
Conspiracy Theories on the Right are Finally Being Proven True
Airdrops and Elections
I’m Running for Congress to Take Action and Deliver Results
Gavin Newsom Visits the Southern Border After Handing Out Freebies to Illegal Migrants
Ted Cruz: 'Joe Biden Campaigned on Dismantling the Southern Border'
Biden's Sending More Aid to Gaza, but That's Not the Only Issue
Joe Biden's 2024 Chances Look Grim As Trump Tops the Polls
Hundreds of J6 Cases Could Be Shortened in Massive Court Win

A Gorilla 'Tragedy'

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of

A gorilla has taken control of your TV set.

What an apt metaphor for the past year. In fact, of course, I refer to the actual gorilla that was (if you take the word of some of the more unhinged commenters on social media) "assassinated" by zoo officials in Cincinnati.


I nearly wrote "who," but that would be to commit the error so many are making in this case -- confusing animals with people.

To recap: A family visited the gorilla exhibit over Memorial Day weekend. A 3-year-old child managed to slip into the gorilla enclosure while his mother was distracted.

Zoo officials explained that under these circumstances, they could not risk attempting to tranquilize the animal, because 1) tranquilizer darts take time to work; 2) the dart could have angered the ape; and 3) it would have taken only a matter of seconds for the gorilla to kill the child.

One criticism of the zoo seems entirely sensible and understandable: Why was the enclosure not childproof? At every zoo I've visited, visitors are kept safely away from dangerous animals. So if the fence wasn't secure enough to prevent a 3-year-old from squeezing through, someone should lose his job. Thank God a tragedy was averted by the quick action of zoo officials, who did the only thing they could do by shooting the gorilla (and good shot, by the way), but it could have been much worse.

But wait. In an avalanche of moral confusion, many people seem to have their heads screwed on wrong. The death of the animal -- a shame, to be sure -- is being called a "tragedy." Oh, yes, the White House spokesman himself said so. A string of silly celebrities wailed that the gorilla had been killed due to poor parenting. Actor Trevor Donovan tweeted, "'17 yr old Harambe the gorilla was shot dead after boy falls into Ohio zoo enclosure' Where were the parents?!"


Donovan must not have children. Those of us who do are aware that as watchful as we are, children can still put themselves in danger sometimes. Where are all these parenting police when parents do truly awful things, like giving their children drugs, or guns, or letting them watch TV 10 hours a day? I have no idea whether Michelle Gregg, the boy's mother, is a good parent or not, but I do know that the fact that he was out of her sight for a few seconds doesn't answer that question.

Actress Kaley Cuoco posted, "Once again, another animal being killed over people not using their brains. If you watch the footage, you see this gorgeous animal holding the child's hand. Do with that what you will." Here's what I do with it: I look at what happened after the first few seconds. Harambe, the 450-pound male gorilla, at first treated the little boy gently, but then, perhaps agitated by the crowd's cries, dragged the child by the ankle through the water and into another section of the exhibit. The boy's head was banging on concrete. It was not a scene from "Curious George."

An online petition calling for "Justice for Harambe" has received 100,000 signatures. CNN informs us that the name Harambe is Swahili for "come together for a common cause." And the Cincinnati police are reportedly investigating the little boy's family. "Cincinnati police said Tuesday that their review will focus on the actions of the boy's parents and family," CNN reported. "It is not related to the operation or safety of the Cincinnati Zoo, authorities said." Well, that's completely backward.


Concern for animal welfare is not decadent. Some serious people argue that zoos and aquariums are inherently cruel, and they deserve a hearing. What's so off about the reactions to this sad tale is the confusion about who has moral standing. "Justice" is not something to which animals are entitled, because animals are not moral agents. Those demanding "justice" for a gorilla are saying something nonsensical. Suppose the gorilla had climbed out of the enclosure and grabbed the boy? Would his advocates demand that he be tried for assault? Of course not. The gorilla cannot be held legally or morally liable for his actions because he is a dumb beast. By the same token, he cannot receive "justice" from anyone. Animals can and should be treated humanely not because they are humane but because we are.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member


Trending on Townhall Videos