The Despicable Democrat Tactic Being Deployed in a GOP House Primary in Missouri
Clips Attacking Salem's Chris Stigall in Congressional Primary Exposed As Deceptive
GOP Senator Just Hit the Brakes on the House's Amnesty Push for Haitians
Bombshell DOJ Report Vindicates ACLJ Action: Biden Admin Weaponized FACE Act Against Pro-L...
California Democrats Admit They Knew About Eric Swalwell's Sexual Misconduct All Along
House GOP Narrowly Crushes Democrats' Iran War Powers Resolution
Can We All Finally Admit Democrats' Gun Control Schemes Do Not Work?
Ramaswamy's Primary Opponent for Ohio Governor Just Crossed the Line
The Real Threat to Our Students Isn't Guns. It's Something in the Building...
Mamdani Wants to Redirect Iran War Funds to Americans—but It’s Not That Simple
This Democrat Still Thinks That No Amount of Success in Iran Was Worth...
Linda McMahon Blasts the Lack of Patriotism Among Teachers and Administrators
New York Times Explains Why Birthright Citizenship Doesn’t Work
Florida Couldn't Buy Better Advertising Than Mamdani's NYC Tax Announcement
Oregon Woman Used 27 People's Identities to Pocket Nearly $600K in Fake Unemployment...
OPINION

ObamaCare’s Contraceptive-Coverage Mandate

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
ObamaCare’s Contraceptive-Coverage Mandate

My Cato colleague John Cochrane – who is way smarter than I am — has a generally excellent op-ed in today’s Wall Street Journal on ObamaCare’s contraception mandate:

Advertisement

Salting mandated health insurance with birth control is exactly the same as a tax—on employers, on Catholics, on gay men and women, on couples trying to have children and on the elderly—to subsidize one form of birth control…

The tax rate and spending debates that occupy the media are a small part of the effective taxes and spending that the government achieves by these regulatory mandates…

The natural compromise is simple: Birth control, abortion and other contentious practices are permitted. But those who object don’t have to pay for them. The federal takeover of medicine prevents us from reaching these natural compromises and needlessly divides our society…

Sure, churches should be exempt. We should all be exempt.

My only quibble is with his claim, “Insurance is a bad idea for small, regular and predictable expenses.”

That’s generally true. But medicine is an area where, potentially at least, small up-front expenditures (e.g., on hypertension control) could prevent large losses down the road. So it may be economically efficient for health plans to cover some small, regular, and predictable expenses. Both the carrier and the consumer would benefit. In fact, that would be the market’s way of telling otherwise uninformed consumers, “Hey! Controlling your hypertension is a really good for you!”

Advertisement

And really, if someone is so risk-averse that they want health insurance with first-dollar coverage of everything – and they’re willing to pay the outrageous premiums that would accompany such coverage — why should we take issue with that?

ObamaCare’s contraceptive-coverage mandate demonstrates that government does  a horrible job of picking only those types of “preventive” services for which first-dollar coverage will leave consumers better off. But I also think advocates of free-market health care generally need to let go of the idea that health insurance exists only for catastrophic expenses.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement