Trump Wants to Know Some Things About Ann Selzer Before She Retires
SecDef Pete Hegseth Will Be A Welcome Injection Of Vitamin I (Infantry)
Democrats Are Broke And Broken
What to Make of Trump's EPA, Interior, and Energy Nominees
Cleanup on Aisle 7
The DOJ Deserves a Matt Gaetz
Gaetz Will Be Trump's Wingman As Attorney General
Trump’s Vigor in the Choice of Cabinet Nominees Brings Shock and Awe
MSM Ignores Gender Gap Disappearing in 2024 Election with White Women
Trump Taps Brendan Carr to Lead the FCC
Pentagon Fails to Answer Where $824 Billion Went
WWIII: Biden Authorizes Ukraine to Use U.S. Long-Range Missiles to Target Inside Russia
WaPo Calls Out Dem Bob Casey for Trying to Overturn PA Senate Race
Here's How Transgender Minors Are Responding to Trump's Election Victory
So, Pete Hegseth Is Now a White Supremacist?
OPINION

Some Final Thoughts on Reparations

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement
AP Photo/Michael Conroy

How would reparations be funded?

Conservative writer Michael Medved estimates that only 5% of whites in America "bear any authentic sort of generational guilt for the exploitation of slave labor."

Advertisement

Why should anyone but Democrats pay?

Scholar Dinesh D'Souza notes that all but a "handful" of slave owners were Democrats. The Ku Klux Klan, at its height of power and popularity, was known by the NAACP as the "terror wing" of the Democratic Party. The KKK was founded by Democrats; I did not say by the Democratic Party, but by Democrats. As a percentage of their party, more House Republicans voted for the Civil Rights Act of 1964 than did House Democrats. As a percentage of their party, more Senate Republicans voted for the Civil Rights Act of 1964 than did Senate Democrats.

I recently reread Martin Luther King Jr.'s 1963 "Letter from a Birmingham Jail," in which he takes fellow clergymen to task for asking him to wait. King wrote:

"Perhaps it is easy for those who have never felt the stinging darts of segregation to say, 'Wait.' But when you have seen vicious mobs lynch your mothers and fathers at will and drown your sisters and brothers at whim; when you have seen hate filled policemen curse, kick and even kill your black brothers and sisters. ... When you are harried by day and haunted by night by the fact that you are a Negro, living constantly at tiptoe stance, never quite knowing what to expect next, and are plagued with inner fears and outer resentments; when you are forever fighting a degenerating sense of 'nobodiness' -- then you will understand why we find it difficult to wait."

Advertisement

We no longer live in that America.

In 1964, King gave an interview to the BBC where he predicted there could be a Black president in "less than 40 years. I would think that this can come in 25 years or less." Just about right on the 40-year schedule, America elected Barack Obama.

King did not say that in less than 40 years' time, there will have been a Black female president of an Ivy League college -- which we have had. He did not say in 40 years, they'll be a Black CEO of a Fortune 500 company; there have been several, including the former CEO of McDonald's. King didn't say in 40 years, there will be a Black governor of a state like Virginia, the capital state of the Confederacy -- which has happened. He didn't say when 80% of Blacks will no longer be poor, which is now the case.

No, King suggested that we will have reached the promised land when America elects a Black president. Why? Because in the privacy of the voting booth or the mail-in ballot, one can vote however one wants. If a voter is racist, he or she can vote accordingly. King felt when Americans became fair-minded enough to elect a Black person whom they felt qualified for the presidency, we then have reached a point where we are evaluating each other based on content of our character, rather than color of skin, to the fullest degree realistically possible.

Far more important than the issue of reparations is this: Why has the rate of out-of-wedlock births in the Black community nearly tripled from 1965 until now, when America is clearly less racist now than 56 years ago? Even during slavery, a Black child was more likely to live under a roof with his or her biological mother and biological father than today. This makes linking today's problems to slavery and Jim Crow all the more difficult.

Advertisement

In 1965, 24% of Black children were born outside of wedlock. In 2018 -- the latest year available -- that number was 69%. On Father's Day in 2008, Barack Obama said: "We know the statistics -- that children who grow up without a father are five times more likely to live in poverty and commit crime; nine times more likely to drop out of schools and 20 times more likely to end up in prison."

Finally, Obama, when asked about reparations in 2016, said:

"It is easy to make that theoretical argument. But as a practical matter, it is hard to think of any society in human history in which a majority population has said that as a consequence of historic wrongs, we are now going to take a big chunk of the nation's resources over a long period of time to make that right."

He was right.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos