Our Self-Induced Catastrophe At the Border
America’s Vaccine Foghorn Falls Ill, Parliament Falls for British Tabloids, and CNN Falls...
John Fetterman's Slovenliness and the Demise of Objective Social Standards
'Public Broadcasting' Bored Silly by Republican Hearings
Jack Smith’s Gag Order Request Is Unconstitutional and Un-American
Paying Iranian Terrorists Billions in Ransom Is Nothing To Brag About, Mr. President
The Surge of Populism -- and Nationalism
It’s the Spending, Stupid
There Probably Needs to Be a Law
Project Veritas Declares Bankruptcy Months After James O’Keefe Firing
The Biden Admin's Next Plans for Illegal Aliens Should Scare You
Dave McCormick Launches Senate Bid in Pennsylvania
'Rules For Thee, Not For Me': The Democrat Party's Tried and True Slogan
Biden’s Suffers a Second Awkward Moment In Less Than 24 Hours
Texas Defies Joe Biden, Reinstalls Razor Wire to Keep Illegal Migrants Out

Democrats Indulged in the Same Tactics They Are Accusing Russia of in the Alabama Special Election

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.

Russia, Russia, Russia. It’s the all-too familiar rallying cry of the #NeverTrump mainstream media, but is this really a problem that is much bigger than just one election cycle, and one polarizing presidential candidate?


Two recently released reports by Oxford University’s Computational Propaganda Project in cooperation with Graphika, and another by researchers for New Knowledge, Columbia University and Canfield Research, which was commissioned by the Bipartisan Senate Select Committee on Intelligence (SSCI), shed some light on exactly what activities occurred with specificity to the range of offenses.

The first report, prepared by Oxford University’s Computational Propaganda Project and Graphika, a network analysis firm, on Russian meddling in the 2016 election shed some light on the problem, given that it was able to attach specificity to the range of offenses. The report detailed the activities of Russia’s Internet Research Agency (IRA) over the past several years.

According to the Oxford report:

  • Between 2013 and 2018, the IRA’s Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter campaigns reached tens of millions of users in the United States.
  • Over 30 million users, between 2015 and 2017, shared the IRA’s Facebook and Instagram posts with their friends and family, liking, reacting to, and commenting on them along the way.
  • Peaks in advertising and organic activity often corresponded to important dates in the US political calendar, ongoing crises, and international events.
  • IRA activities focused on the US began on Twitter in 2013, but quickly evolved into a multi-platform strategy involving Facebook, Instagram, and YouTube among other platforms.
  • The most far reaching IRA activity was in organic posting, not advertisements.

The Second Report, titled The Tactics & Tropes of the Internet Research Agency, lays out a 3-pronged scenario where Russia attempted to hack online voting systems, initiated a cyber-attack against the DNC and used social media platforms to carry out coordinated disinformation operations with the intent to influence American voters and fan the flames of division.

The report states that the “SSCI began an investigation into the IRA’s social media activities following the 2016 election around the same time that investigative journalists and third-party researchers became aware that IRA’s campaign had touched all major platforms in the social network ecosystem.” 

In March 2018, some of the social platform companies misused by the IRA including Twitter and Facebook provided the SSCI with data related to IRA influence operations. Facebook’s data submission included Facebook Page posts and Instagram account content.

In addition to what was disclosed in these reports, another wrinkle in this story is the matter of Russian hacker Konstantin Kozlovsky. Kozlovsky had claimed to have built the software that was used to hack the Democratic National Committee and other American targets. Kozlovsky, also claims to have developed a program called LDCS that has the ability to “replace information on Twitter, Facebook, Google and leading U.S. media outlets,” behaving in a similar manner to “redirect viruses” like the V9 redirect virus. 


Also absent from these reports was any mention of the recent revelations of Democratic malfeasance uncovered in the hotly contested Alabama senatorial special election between Democrat Doug Jones and Republican Roy Moore.

Although the Democrats have long attempted to hang their hats on the Russian collusion narrative for their inability to secure either chamber of congress after the 2014 and 2016 election cycles, they weren’t above attempting to use the same tactics they blamed for those losses against the candidacy of Moore in December of 2017. 

It is now known that Democratic operatives, one with direct ties to the Obama Administration, enabled the creation thousands of fake Russian social media accounts to create the impression that Alabama Republican Roy Moore was Russia’s preferred candidate in last year’s election against now-Sen. Democrat Doug Jones.

The $100,000 project was executed on Facebook and Twitter, and revealed by the New York Times.

“We orchestrated an elaborate ‘false flag’ operation that planted the idea that the Moore campaign was amplified on social media by a Russian botnet,” the internal report reads. It also states that efforts intended to radicalize Democrats with a Russian bot scandal after experimenting with many of the tactics now “understood to have influenced the 2016 elections,” were carried out.


To his credit, the beneficiary of this underhanded misdirection, Sen. Jones, has expressed “outrage” over the matter.

"I'd like to see the Federal Election Commission and the Justice Department look at this to see if there were any laws being violated and, if there were, prosecute those responsible," Jones said. "These authorities need to use this example right now to start setting the course for the future to let people know that this is not acceptable in the United States of America."

It is becoming clearer that in the digital age, new tactics, many which are possibly illegal, will continue to be applied by both foreign and domestic perpetrators. Moving forward, American election officials will continually have to adjust for these new methods of election rigging, as well as taking a closer look at the practices of the DNC.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member


Trending on Townhall Videos