Here's Scott Jennings' Take on Trump's White House Correspondents' Association Dinner Spee...
We Might Have Some More Ballot Drama in Maine
How Alaska Is Cleaning Up Its Voter Rolls
Former MSNBC Analyst Admits Republicans Were Right About This Regarding Our Elections
GOP Sends Letter to NJ Governor: What the Hell Happened to Your Voter...
Democrats Do Not Speak for All Women
The Kind of People Who Run for Government Office
Black-On-White Crime Remains Epidemic
On National Parents’ Day, Remember: Parents—Not the State—Know and Love Their Children Bes...
The Unlikely Incubators of Liberty
The Faculty Lounge Is Where the Rot Started
Troy Jackson Crowned As New Maine Senate Nominee
We Now Have the Truth About That Viral ICE Story That Sparked Massive...
The Process to Replace Graham Platner Is Already Off to a Rough Start...
The Conservative Case for American Cement
OPINION

Tax Reform Could Be the GOP's Obamacare

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
Tax Reform Could Be the GOP's Obamacare

Will the tax reform effort be the GOP's version of Obamacare? I don't know, and neither does anyone else. We have little idea what the final legislation will look like, and even if we did, it's hard to predict its overall effect.

Advertisement

But there are some similarities already, starting with the ugliness of the process.

For years, Republicans mocked Rep. Nancy Pelosi -- and other Democrats -- for dismissing the need to read the text of the Affordable Care Act before passing it. This time around, Republicans have insisted that we must pass tax reform to know what's in it, and Democrats have denounced the sausage-making.

The more important similarity lies in the fact that both parties pursued long-term ideological goals in the face of public opposition. President Obama gave dozens of speeches in favor of the Affordable Care Act, and yet it was never popular with voters before passage or after -- at least not until Donald Trump was elected, which just shows you how policy preferences take a backseat to partisanship.

In both instances, the respective parties made a bet that voters would reward their efforts in the long term. During the Obama years, the Democrats' bet didn't pay off. They lost control of both houses of Congress, at least in large part because of Obamacare, and one could certainly argue that the issue helped Trump in 2016.

Republicans are betting that the middle-class tax cuts combined with an expected boost in economic growth from the cut in the corporate tax rate will result in a political windfall.

Contrary to a lot of hysterical punditry, partisan rhetoric and sloppy reporting, there's a plausible case that this could happen. House Speaker Paul Ryan's initial claim that "everybody" will get a tax cut was an overstatement, but he's on sounder footing when he notes that the average taxpayer in each bracket will get one.

Advertisement

But some people won't. Indeed, some wealthy people in particular could get screwed. The Wall Street Journal reports that a few high-income taxpayers could -- under the Senate GOP version -- actually see a marginal tax rate of more than 100 percent. FDR once proposed 100 percent top tax rate. Who would have predicted that the GOP would inadvertently revive that idea?

More broadly, a lot of upscale taxpayers in blue states could see their tax bills go up if the Republicans cap or eliminate various state and local tax deductions as well as the home mortgage interest deduction.

Opponents insist that this is a deliberate effort to punish blue states, which have much higher income and property taxes and housing costs. These claims seem somewhat overblown. Ronald Reagan wanted to eliminate the state and local tax deduction at a time when the red-blue divide was less meaningful.

Moreover, tax reformers, including many on the left, have wanted to get rid of, or reform, the home mortgage interest deduction for decades, particularly for second homes. Why should the federal government subsidize affluent people buying bigger homes, never mind country houses?

Also, as my National Review colleague Ramesh Ponnuru notes, the House version seeks to get rid of the alternative minimum tax, which disproportionately hurts taxpayers in blue states. If partisan vengeance were a higher priority than policy, they wouldn't kill it. Then again, the Senate version keeps it, so who knows?

Advertisement

That's just it. What makes all of this so unpredictable -- and so similar to Obamacare -- is that economic analysis is of secondary importance.

It's unlikely that the 35 percent of (no doubt mostly Republican) voters who support the tax effort are doing so out of pure self-interest. Rather, many want President Trump -- who, ironically, ran against big corporations -- to have a win. Likewise, Democrats insisting that GOP tax reform amounts to "Armageddon" (Pelosi's term) are surely driven more by partisan myopia than careful study of the tax tables.

The GOP plan may end up being a win in economic terms. Whether it's a political win for the GOP will probably depend on political factors not found on a spreadsheet.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement