James Talarico Still Can't Escape His Past
Following a Bloody Weekend, Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson Touts City's Bizarre Emergency D...
After Letting the Homeless Freeze to Death, Mamdani Announces 'Extreme Heat' Executive Ord...
Acting AG Todd Blanche Announces Healthcare Fraud Charges Against Hundreds of Defendants
Scott Wiener Gets Dragged for Saying the Rainbow Is About 'Pride'
Despite Democrats' Best Efforts, Title IX Turns 54
Illegal Immigrant Busted After Using Uber Gig to Kidnap, Assault Passenger
After Smearing Elon Musk, Ro Khanna Is Desperately Trying to Avoid a Massive...
Spencer Pratt Compares Los Angeles' Fashion District to Milan's and It Was Simply...
Algae Can Only Survive Off What Others Create—Just Like the Left
Iran Is Already Denying It Agreed to Nuclear Inspections
Trump Reveals Why He Isn't Worried About Releasing Frozen Iranian Funds
Talarico Offends Christians Yet Again by Claiming He 'Hates' Christianity
Guess Who Just Endorsed Graham Platner. The Irony Is Real.
MLB Commissioner Backs Off Warning to Giants Players Over 'Pride Night' Bible Verses
OPINION

The Student Loan Debate Shows How the ACLU Has Lost Its Way

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of Townhall.com.
The Student Loan Debate Shows How the ACLU Has Lost Its Way
AP Photo/Susan Walsh

The American Civil Liberties Union last week applauded President Joe Biden's plan to cancel student loan debt, which it describes as "a racial justice issue." That puzzling position encapsulates how far the venerable organization has strayed from the mission reflected in its name.

Advertisement

Under Biden's new policy, borrowers earning up to $125,000 a year will be eligible for $10,000 in debt relief, or twice that amount if they qualified for Pell Grants as students. The 43 million or so beneficiaries include many affluent people who could readily afford to pay off their loans, while the cost, which is projected to be at least $300 billion, will be borne by taxpayers, including Americans of relatively modest means.

Some of the people picking up the tab never attended college, while others struggled to do so without borrowing money or have already paid off their loans. But in the ACLU's view, that seemingly unfair redistribution of resources is what racial justice demands.

"This debt burden falls heaviest on Black Americans -- especially Black women," the ACLU says. "Student debt cancellation will help secure financial stability and mobility for people of color -- particularly Black Americans -- who are disproportionately burdened with student debt while providing immediate financial relief and peace of mind for millions of Americans."

Whatever you might think of that argument, it has nothing to do with protecting civil liberties. The 14th Amendment guarantees equal protection under the law, but it does not promise to eradicate racial disparities in educational or economic success.

As the ACLU sees it, however, any such disparities result from "centuries of structural inequities and racism." The federal government therefore has a duty to ensure equal outcomes, which requires wide-ranging interventions, including welfare programs, education spending, job training, affirmative action, public housing, tax credits and state-subsidized health care.

Advertisement

To give you a sense of how far afield that cause takes the ACLU from the defense of constitutional rights, the organization argues that "broadband access for all" is a racial justice issue because people without broadband access "are disproportionately Black, Latinx, Indigenous, rural, or low-income." The ACLU describes the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, which it urged the Supreme Court to uphold, as "a great civil rights law" because "it is not possible to fully participate in the economic, social, and civic life of our nation without stable health coverage."

If "stable health coverage" is a prerequisite for fully participating in "the economic, social, and civic life of our nation," so is stable housing, stable employment and a stable supply of food, clothing and transportation. Such reasoning expands the ACLU's mission to include pretty much any domestic policy issue.

The ACLU's embrace of a broad progressive agenda alienates potential allies who do not necessarily agree with that agenda but support vigorous advocacy for civil liberties. It also weakens the ACLU's commitment to the goals that once defined the organization, including the defense of First Amendment rights.

According to an internal staff memo that was leaked in 2018, ACLU attorneys who are thinking about defending a potential client's right to express opinions they find repugnant -- the sort of function that the organization has proudly served through most of its history -- should consider how that might conflict with "other values" supported by the ACLU. "Speech that denigrates (marginalized) groups can inflict serious harms," the memo warned, "and often will impede progress toward equality."

Advertisement

A case the Supreme Court will hear during its next term further illustrates how the ACLU has lost its way. The organization argues that a Colorado woman who has religious objections to gay marriage should nevertheless be forced to apply her artistic talents in designing websites for same-sex weddings, notwithstanding the First Amendment's restrictions on compelled speech.

A consistent defense of civil liberties is the ACLU's raison d'etre. But as the organization becomes increasingly indistinguishable from myriad progressive advocacy groups, it is sacrificing the principles that made its work worthy of wide support.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member

Recommended

Trending on Townhall Videos

Advertisement
Advertisement
Advertisement