Adam Schiff Has Thoughts About the Trump Indictment
Trump Vows to Defeat Bragg and Take Back the Country
Here's One Shocking Liberal Media Reaction to Trump's Indictment
BREAKING: Donald Trump Indicted by Manhattan Grand Jury
Just How Deep Does the Border Crisis Go? One Book Brings It All...
Elon Likes Censorship After All
DA and Trump’s Team In Contact to Surrender Him
DeSantis: Florida Will Not Cooperate With Trump Extradition
Pompeo: Manhattan DA Makes the American Legal System Look Like a ‘Tool for...
Cruz, Ronny Jackson and Other Republicans React to Trump's Unfair Indictment
'Find Faith in Our Judicial System': Is Former Trump Impeachment Manager Joking?
Vivek Ramaswamy Slams Manhattan DA's 'Politically Motivated' Trump Indictment
The Left's Favorite Republican Is Getting Some Attention in 2024 Polls
Anti-Gun Protestors Storm Tennessee Capitol Demanding Gun Control
Fire at Mexican Migrant Center Leaves at Least 38 Dead

A Bad Apple for the Big Apple

The opinions expressed by columnists are their own and do not necessarily represent the views of

WASHINGTON -- I am afraid that fewer than one million out of the 4.3 million registered voters of New York City have settled upon the Big Apple a bad apple for mayor, the Hon. Bill de Blasio. What some three million registered New Yorkers were doing when 752,604 of their fellow citizens elected this Bad Apple to the mayor's mansion, I do not know. New York City embraces a very sophisticated citizenry, possibly the most sophisticated of any city in America. So perhaps they were all at a museum on Election Day or writing poetry or learning ancient Greek. But while they were indulging themselves, the moron vote brought from obscurity to Gracie Mansion a clod.

He worked for the Sandinistas in Nicaragua in 1988! He honeymooned in Cuba in 1991! He claims he never saw any Sandinista brutality in Nicaragua, and that "it's well-known that there's been some good things that happened in" Cuba. He might be referring to the Cuban gulag. From now on I am traveling to New York incognito. I suggest you do, too.

This bad apple is the epitome of a demagogue, but he is also only semi-literate. In his inaugural address he said things like "Big dreams are not a luxury of the privileged few." Actually a luxury is "an inessential, desirable item that is expensive or difficult to obtain." So says the New Oxford American Dictionary, and all other American dictionaries pretty much agree. A dream is not a luxury. He ranted on, the city "is not the exclusive domain of the One Percent." This is the cant of the radicals who in recent years were taking over parks and other public places, fouling them with their bodily discharges and committing petty crimes -- some not so petty, for instance, rape and mayhem. If de Blasio were more careful with his rhetoric, he would refrain from using the language of barbarians.

Yet he cannot resist such demagogic urge, because he thinks he has been raised to the mayorship of a third world metropolis. Actually, New York City includes, along with its one percent, a prosperous middle class and an industrious working class -- along with its impoverished minority. The impoverished are the unfortunates of the city, but things are being done to help them, and the most promising things being done are in education where the lucky ones go to charter schools. Many of the very poor rely on these charter schools. Now with the complicity of the teachers unions, de Blasio wants to make the challenges of the charter schools even greater. He will, if he has his way, have all students enrolled in the city's failing schools.

De Blasio shares with another so-called "progressive" the ill-informed view that income inequality is a grave problem in America. His fellow progressive, President Barack Obama, said on Dec. 4 that "a dangerous and growing inequality and lack of upward mobility" is "the defining challenge of our time." But inequality is "growing" only if you listen to the tendentious left. Truth be known, according to a scholarly study conducted by Lee Ohanian and Kip Hagopian for Policy Review, "inequality actually declined 1.8 percent between 1993 and 2009. ... " Even the president admitted in his December speech that the rate of poverty has declined by 40 percent since 1967 from 26 percent to 16 percent, but ignored this passage's import in his speech. Other studies, for instance, one released by the Congressional Budget Office in October 2011, have come to similar conclusions.

The reason these demagogues overstate income inequality is that they rely on studies that ignore taxes, for instance, the progressive income tax, and transfer payments to the poor, for instance, nutrition assistance, housing assistance, Medicaid and Medicare. Also they ignore the Earned Income Tax Credit and in the months ahead the transfer payments from Obamacare that the better off and the young will pay out. When you add these up, the poor have been doing rather well.

Yet the poor are not doing as well as they could be doing from a faster growing economy and better jobs. The problem in New York is the same as the problem in America as a whole. The economy is growing too slowly, and nothing the Hon. de Blasio or the president prescribes will fix it.

Join the conversation as a VIP Member


Trending on Townhall Video